Comments on: friday free for all!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:30:00 +0000

Anon, well I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you havn't been around for very long.i've been on VHB, chipman's blog and this blog and, more recently, enjoyed solipsist's posts on his blog (is it still around)?satv/thumbsup is annoying for sure! whatever his motives, he's incurable. i don't think it matters to him what he says or what we think of him ... it's just a game in his world.but so are you (annoying) from time to time. do you restrict your rude comments to satv?and i'm a pain in the butt when i set my mind to it. must have got up on the wrong side of bed yesterday. i'll stop being a pain in the butt, effective immediately.regarding "is that someone worth treating with respect", i think the philosophical and judeochristian answer is "treat everyone with respect" ... but obviously i'm not very good at it ;-[

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Drachen

Drachen — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000

Anon, well I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you havn't been around for very long. Thumbsup/SATV/ whatever else he was calling himself in the in-between phase has been around here for months. He spews out barely intelligible gibberish about how things are set to go up forever, the market will never fall blah blah blah. He never provides any factual information except for the occasional snippet from a pumper article or a bit of data showing how YOY prices are up in whatever place.His comments are not worth the bits they're written in, he's annoying, illiterate and seemingly incapable of forms of logic normally associated with higher primates. Yet in spite of all that he maintains a superior air and a complete conviction of his own infallibility. Now you tell me, is that someone worth treating with respect?

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: ThumbsUp

ThumbsUp — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:03:00 +0000

Thanks to all anon's.I was surprised, how can some one repeat same stuff in the next thread without answering in previous thread.those are sign to show cleverness than again switching over from the issue,clever twice..thanx anon's keep up the good work.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:50:00 +0000

if that IS your real nameoh, that was a good one!Stop trying to play cleversee above, it's not me playing that game.there are no clever bulls left.not a bull.actually, i just think you're exceptionally rude and somewhat arrogant. was trying to point that out, somewhat ineffectually. sorry, you missed the point.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Drachen

Drachen — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:16:00 +0000

Actually Anonymous (if that IS your real name)You would be 100% wrong on that. There are no fallacies where you say there are because I wasn't attempting to make an argument, just an observation.Stop trying to play clever, there are no clever bulls left.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:02:00 +0000

Drachen was not defining ...a good overview of fallacies, simply presented, without drachen's usual arrogant sarcasm. i stand corrected. thank you.where would drachen's arguments fit?Wow, getting realty information from luckycat is like getting diet information from McDonalds...They wouldn't let him in, too hypocritical and not pedantic enough.I know there's some big words in there but if you need help I can explain them to you. Do that, and come back here and tell me that things are fine down south and I'll just write you off as hopelessly deluded.Choose:(a) just plain rude.(b) ad hominem fallacy ... under the guise of "i'm too busy to respond patiently or intelligently"(c) just plain arrogant.(d) all of the above.Thought: Drachen, dragons don't have to breathe fire.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:34:00 +0000

Drachen was not defining what a fallacy is, but was instead identifying the specific fallacy in Thumbsup's argument

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:45:00 +0000

Fallacy: appeal to emotion.wtf? I thought I understood the word fallacy, but I guess I don't know the loosy-goosy meaning of it in Drachen's world. I guess if you're arrogant enough, you can redefine just about anything.so drachy dude, i thought i would never agree with satv/thumby/thumbsup/whatever on anything, but i'm with him on this one.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: ThumbsUp

ThumbsUp — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:53:00 +0000

Freako and Rentah posted in Realestatetalks many years ago it was bad to own at that time and they were proven wrong.Anon,do you know?.it cost too much to buy something and cost nothing to say"bubble""B"is a god for bears.Rentha has left us anyway may be begging for pardon in calgary with his wife.Vhb learnt his lesson with in one year so he is on the path of improvement.Freako is neutral so just forgive him because if you can produce hard argument you are able to convince him.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)

By: Drachen

Drachen — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:00:00 +0000

Thumby:From now on, I'm not going to engage your fallacious arguments. I'm just going to point them out."Buying a palce to live in the hottest city you love is equal to securing a shack for your self and for your family,Not from any sense is a bussiness."Fallacy: appeal to emotion.

Current score: 0 (to vote for this comment, please visit the site)