Canadian house prices drop
This from today’s Globe and Mail - Canadian house prices dropped in June for the first time in nine years:
Canadian home prices fell in June for the first time since January, 1999, as the number of houses for sale remained at record levels.
The average price of an existing home fell 0.4 per cent in June to $341,096, compared with $342,615 the year before, according to statistics released Tuesday by the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA).
“The fall in home prices…is a sizable dip in this indicator, given that not too long ago the Canadian housing market was witnessing double-digit price gains,” Millan Mulraine, economic strategist at TD Securities Inc., said in a research note.
Of the 25 major markets included in the statistics, average home prices declined on a year-over-year basis in Calgary, Edmonton, Victoria and Windsor-Essex. The largest decline of 2.6 per cent was in Edmonton, while the smallest was in Windsor-Essex at 0.5 per cent.
Last month, BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. economist Douglas Porter raised the possibility of an overall drop in home prices in Canada. Most industry watchers have stayed with the view that home prices will rise slightly this year.
In June, Mr. Porter said it was “unnerving” to note that Canada’s housing market performance appears to be tracking that of the U.S. but with a two-year lag, although he also sees a number of differences between the two markets.
He said he was tracking prices in the “middle ground,” cities such as Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa, which still have fairly robust economic fundamentals but haven’t been supercharged by the commodities boom.
Prices in those cities all rose moderately year-over-year in June, up 3.7 per cent in Toronto, 4 per cent in Montreal and 6.8 per cent in Ottawa.
The Canadian and U.S. markets are still very different, CREA president Calvin Lindberg said in a statement. U.S. home prices dropped by 14.1 per cent in the first quarter of the year, according to the benchmark Case-Shiller national home price index.
Out local market stands out as the biggest year-over-year decrease in sales in all the Nation, Greater Vancouver saw sales drop 42.9% from last June.
July 15th, 2008 at 9:55 am
Bulls will be littering the landscape like sick, weak prey ready to be gobbled up by the greedy bears.
July 15th, 2008 at 10:02 am
July 15th, 2008 at 10:09 am
All real estate is local. The national average is only meaningful if applying a hamfisted national housing strategy. Like CMHC, for example.
July 15th, 2008 at 10:10 am
July 15th, 2008 at 10:17 am
July 15th, 2008 at 10:24 am
July 15th, 2008 at 10:29 am
July 15th, 2008 at 10:31 am
http://ktla.trb.com/news/ktla-mortgages,0,1444873.story
At least three police squad cars arrived at the branch on Ventura Boulevard to restore order before the bank opened its doors at 8:00am. Police urged customers to remain calm or face arrest as they tried to pull their money on the second day of the failed institution’s federal takeover.
July 15th, 2008 at 10:42 am
Q (from Vancouver):Do you think removing 0% down mortgages will increase affordability by reducing demand, and therefore prices?
A the short answer is yes. I mean, you’re from Vancouver, where the average house price there is $611,000 according to data released today by the Canadian Real Estate Association. My trusty calculator tells me that 5 per cent of $611,000 is $30,550, which is a fair chunk of change to save up. Never mind that you’ll need much more than that to pay for lawyers, movers and various other home-buying fees. Bottom line: It’s going to take people time to save up that new minimum 5 per cent downpayment, and that can’t help but slow demand. Simple economics suggests slower demand will have a downward affect on prices.
July 15th, 2008 at 10:46 am
Oil prices tumbled Tuesday, falling at one point by $10 per barrel as Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke offered a pessimistic picture of the U.S. economy.
July 15th, 2008 at 10:50 am
July 15th, 2008 at 11:18 am
There is, what seems to me, a classic example of a financial disaster on Main St. aka Chinatown, aka Skid Row. I went by yesterday and the trucks are pouring concrete like crazy. But, I assume the pre-purchasers will have to make another payment somewhere along the way. If some of them decide to cut their losses what happens to the project?
I don’t really know but I picture half built projects sitting idle for a fairly long time. Does this make sense?
July 15th, 2008 at 11:29 am
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/re … on_demands
July 15th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Kablooey, I say the same thing daily. We have to remember that most of those places were sold over the last 12-24 months. So, as long as the Developer can afford to, they’ll finish the job and pocket the difference. I think over the next 12-24 months you will see quite a decline in building permits around our fair city.
Anecdote: I just came back from a trip to the kootenays… I have never seen so many for sale signs in my life. I have driven the same route hundreds of times over my life and have never seen so many for sale signs up in every single community throughout the Okanagan and West Kootenay.
July 15th, 2008 at 11:53 am
For a long time I’ve kept an eye on the Whistler-style condos and townhouses at McBride and 6th in New West. I might buy there someday.
This time last year, there may have been three or four units on the market, and they were selling fast when well priced. Yesterday, I counted 15 signs in the complex, and NOT ONE sold sticker. I then went on-line and there are actually 17 units for sale, and lots of price reductions.
Nice.
July 15th, 2008 at 12:22 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 10:31 am
This is what a bank failure looks like:
http://ktla.trb.com/news/ktla-mortgages,0,1444873.story
At least three police squad cars arrived at the branch on Ventura Boulevard to restore order before the bank opened its doors at 8:00am. Police urged customers to remain calm or face arrest as they tried to pull their money on the second day of the failed institution’s federal takeover.
I know its off topic but who keeps in excess of 100,000 dollars in a savings account? That is just crazy.
July 15th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
The Fannie and Freddy mess will make the subprime thing look like child’s play, and those distant warnings of that vicious recession are turning into a mighty roar.
Unfortunately, without any recession-proof industry, Vancouver is just as vulnerable as Miami and San Diego. Aside from our bubble driven construction and marketing, we don’t have any industry at all.
If ya can’t hang on to your job, at least try to hang on to your seat.
July 15th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Officer Barbrady
July 15th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
We have everything in BC that anybody could possibly need or want. We have plenty of natural resources (oil, coal, metals, clean water), the ability to generate lots of energy (wind, tidal, hydroelectric, geothermal), we have a highly educated workforce, we have a multi-cultural society with significant links to Asia (huge future growth), we have the closest ports in North America to Asia, we have a diversified economy, we have good governance (surplus budgets and business friendly government) and we have the lowest personal tax rates in Canada!
And then on top of all that, Vancouver is simply a great place to live (world class city, mountains, forests, ocean).
July 15th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
This includes GICs, term deposits.
When a retired couple sells their $1 million mortgage-free home, guess where they do put their money? (hint: not in stocks or oil futures)
There are many people with over $100,000 in their bank accounts. Just go to your local bank and ask for the interest rates they pay for balances over $100,000!
July 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Then its the best time to buy. Haven’t most of you been waiting for the market to calm down so you didn’t have to overbid? Now that its here why aren’t you out there shopping?
July 15th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
The council notes that the last time this happened was 1980-81, 1990 and 1998. In otherwords, the economy is as bad as it was during the previous three housing busts. The Council notes that back to back declines have forecast past recessions and that the indicator is “not susceptible to false signals”.
Here is the report. It is worth reading.
http://www.bcbc.com/Documents/BCEIndexv7n2.pdf
July 15th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
There are very few places in the world that look as good as we do looking forward 20yrs.
I’m not saying anyone should go out and buy investment properties, but for a home, yes, buy as soon as you can and never look back.
July 15th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Yup, just checked the calendar….full moon approaching.
Talk about dumb & dumber.
July 15th, 2008 at 2:34 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
In answer to your question Dosh, why would I buy now, when prices will be 1/2 or less in 3 years? I can save up a nice down payment and buy the place I really want in a few years from now rather than stretching the budget to near braking point to be able to afford a place that’s barely liveable.
Which makes more sense?
July 15th, 2008 at 3:41 pm
Is it so crazy? That meager 3% interest is looking good compared to double-digit losses in the stock market right now.
July 15th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
BC has been a net importer of energy for the past number of years.
The only hope on the horizon is Site C. This still hasn’t been officially approved and even if it goes ahead, it will be 10 to 15 years before it is ready.
Be prepared for higher Hydro rates in the foreseeable future is more like it.
July 15th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.j … tviewedbox
July 15th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
And if you look at the facts, while we have been a net importer over some of the last 5yrs it has been deliberate. The reasoning is we buy power off-peak from Alta coal plants when it’s dirt cheap and save our water behind the dams, during the day we open them up and sell the power at on-peak prices. We collect more money this way then if we didn’t import at all.
July 15th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Nice try. Buyer’s market is when prices drop to a level where buyers actually start buying again. It doesn’t hurt to lowball though, though the lowballs I’d be throwing are so low they wouldn’t make it through the door. Yet.
July 15th, 2008 at 4:32 pm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25691314/
“A repo-mans life is always intense!”
July 15th, 2008 at 4:36 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 4:45 pm
There must be some kind of a mistake, are you sure it’s not Vancouver WA?
In Vancouver BC-Home of the 2010 Olympics, prices and sales volumes are supported by fundamentals.
So it must be a mistake, it must be Vancouver the American Vancouver, where they haven’t run out of land yet.
July 15th, 2008 at 4:49 pm
If you can tell the future and you know thats going to happen than no, it doesn’t make sense. But what makes you think your predictions are more accurate than all the experts that disagree with you?
July 15th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
http://seekingalpha.com/article/84903-b … -of-wealth
Seems perfectly fair, that young families should have a chance at “catching up”.
July 15th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
awaiting with bated breath……
July 15th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
note the words CIBC and solvent
http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet … iness/home
(jacked from the alberta bubble blog)
July 15th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
July 15th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Check out MLS: v718364, 766 SQFT townhouse downtown
Last sold Jan 11 2007 for $425,000
Assessed Value: $416,000
Asking Price: $485,000
DOM: 22
$/ SQFT: 633
Average $/SQFT townhouses downtown: $614
If priced at average: $470,000
It won’t be long before this flipper is negative equity!
July 15th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
Yes Vince protect yourself,get rid of debt, because after inflation comes recession.stagflation ,and real estate crashes…….Always!
Your right Vince ,it is not different this time.
You know you will get stuck with negative equity and negative cash flow.
July 15th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
v720657 1118 SQFT townhouse in Coal Harbour
Assessed: 741,000
Last sold for 735,000 in August 2007
DOM: 98 started at 829,000 now down to 785,000
This ones going to hit negative land even faster!
July 15th, 2008 at 6:25 pm