Friday Free-for-all!

Read the rest of this entry »

RSS 2.0 comments feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

344 Responses to “Friday Free-for-all!”

Pages: « 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All

  1. 200
  2. van-zee Says:

    RE #199

    I’ve been waiting for these stories of fraud to come out in the MSM. Tales of peoples foolishness and fraudulent real-estate dealings marks the death of a bubble.
    (if you needed any more signs)

    Look for a paper called “historic turning points in Real Estate” Robert J. Shiller. It touches on the similarities in a bunch of cases reflected by the kind of stories told.

    Current score: 2
    Reply to this comment
  3. 199
  4. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Don’t know if someone posted this already, but more good news bwahahaaha

    http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servle.....lumbiaHome

    Current score: 7
    Reply to this comment
  5. 198
  6. Strataman Says:

    STu says “I’ve seen a lot of water go under the bridge, I’ve forgotten more than you’ve learned” Okay Stu doubt you’ve seen much in the way of water, and all of us don’t have Alzeimers (yet), the thing I notice most is that my generation (the boomers) are pretty well a bunch of idiots! Easy gravy times, big wages no responsibility, kinda proud of my kids trouble is they will and have to be twice as smart as me! There is no good deals out here nary a one, wait three years and pick whatever is on the market up for 70 % less then today!

    Current score: -1
    Reply to this comment
  7. 197
  8. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Stu: I hear marijuana use is bad for the memory. So sorry.

    Current score: -4
    Reply to this comment
  9. 196
  10. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Oh, and Stu, another you need to know is not to be sexist. This is the internet, not a masonic lodge!

    Current score: -3
    Reply to this comment
  11. 195
  12. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Stu: you’re not really a blogger until someone calls you a dumbass, so here goes: “Dumbass Stu!”

    Current score: -8
    Reply to this comment
  13. 194
  14. Stu Says:

    Don’t worry son, I’ve seen a lot of water go under the bridge, I’ve forgotten more than you’ve learned. There are some excellent condos available on the plateau, highly recommended.

    Current score: -20
    Reply to this comment
  15. 193
  16. patriotz Says:

    At the top of the boom in 1981 west side bungalows were going for the unheard, incomprehensible amount of 300,000 dollars.

    That’s right, and a few years later the same houses were selling for 150K. I know a guy who bought one.

    Current score: 7
    Reply to this comment
  17. 192
  18. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Stu: nice cop-out. When in doubt there is always the airhead response “I’m just new here”.

    Current score: -1
    Reply to this comment
  19. 191
  20. patriotz Says:

    Prices can’t drop if there are no buyers.

    There are always people who are willing and able to buy.

    There are also always people who have to sell due to death, divorce, relocation, etc.

    The point where the number of buyers equals the number of sellers is called the market price.

    There will always be sales because there are always people who have to sell.

    Current score: 5
    Reply to this comment
  21. 190
  22. Stu Says:

    Ha Ha, I’m relatively new to this blogging technology, it is a bit fun. I can see why the kids wonder around pounding their blackberries all day.

    Current score: -9
    Reply to this comment
  23. 189
  24. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Stu: come clean now — how many WP condos are you trying to unload?

    Current score: 0
    Reply to this comment
  25. 188
  26. bdk Says:

    Is Stu just another John trying to take the blog off topic? It looks like satv is trying a bit harder but he’s still an idiot.

    If a townhouse can’t sell for $467 / sq ft in yaletown how are the specuvestors going to get double that for all the new units that are about to go up for sale?
    We have a shortage of renters and buyers here but otherwise everything is great!

    Current score: 13
    Reply to this comment
  27. 187
  28. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    stu: Have you ever thought of writing a book? Sounds like you’ve got one in there (wink, wink).

    Current score: 0
    Reply to this comment
  29. 186
  30. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    stu: do you live in Coquitlam by any chance? Westwood Plateau perchance?

    Current score: 0
    Reply to this comment
  31. 185
  32. Stu Says:

    At the top of the boom in 1981 west side bungalows were going for the unheard, incomprehensible amount of 300,000 dollars. The eastern outpost of Coquitlam was under contstant logging to build new subdivisions, Coquitlam was being transformed from untouched rain forest to single family housing for those growing families looking for a rural experience.

    Current score: -10
    Reply to this comment
  33. 184
  34. betamax Says:

    Anyone who bought a house at the very top of the bubble in 1981 looks like a genius today.

    Because they broke even (in real terms) after 25 years? You need to raise your standards of what “genius” means.

    No more land? Thank god Canada has an ample supply.

    Current score: 17
    Reply to this comment
  35. 183
  36. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Stu: sorry to say, but you sound a bit ill informed.

    Current score: 15
    Reply to this comment
  37. 182
  38. Stu Says:

    I understand what you guys are saying, nonetheless i think real estate is a good investment, generally the cash flow gets better over time. I’m not big on stocks, contrary to what many think stocks are not a good inflation or deflation hedge.

    Current score: -19
    Reply to this comment
  39. 181
  40. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    stu: anyone who bought a house at half price after the 1981 crash is even more of a genius and didn’t have to go through a world of hurt for the past 20 years to pay for it.

    Current score: 7
    Reply to this comment
  41. 180
  42. Keeping an Eye on the Pimps Says:

    “They’re not making any more land here, keep in mind peoples.”

    That is so true, and everyone should know how fast land wears out, and that it is virtually impossible for people who own a lot of land to get involved in municipal politics and get the land rezoned for development.
    It is also true super rich foreigners buy up whatever miniscule land supply we have in British Columbia, and they get it towed to Asia and we never see the land again.

    Current score: 10
    Reply to this comment
  43. 179
  44. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    stu: did you pass your IQ test? e.g., did you get more than 70?

    Current score: -2
    Reply to this comment
  45. 178
  46. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    stu: that’s a BIG “if”. and the question is — will they look like geniuses tomorrow?

    Current score: 3
    Reply to this comment
  47. 177
  48. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    stu: that’s a BIG “if”.

    Current score: 0
    Reply to this comment
  49. 176
  50. Stu Says:

    Anyone who bought a house at the very top of the bubble in 1981 looks like a genius today. Assumption being they handled the negative cash flow for a few years. They’re not making any more land here, keep in mind peoples.

    Current score: -21
    Reply to this comment
  51. 175
  52. Keeping an Eye on the Pimps Says:

    “Tony Joe, Victoria Real Estate Board president, responded by saying that there are pockets in the U.S. where the housing market is healthy.

    If there is a bust in Canada, “There’s going to be insulated places in the country and with all the attributes that Victoria has, of all the places in the country, we are probably best-insulated,” Joe said yesterday.

    In its favour, the capital region has a diversified economy supported by government, tourism, military, retirees, technology and education. Forecasts of net migration of 3,500 this year, plus the shortage of rental housing, further insulate this region, he said”

    Just keeping an eye on the pimps,who saw nothing wrong with speculating,hyping and pumping out of reach,from the average joe, a basic human need, such as housing.

    Current score: 7
    Reply to this comment
  53. 174
  54. wolfey Says:

    post 167 john,

    Will you stop with the rich asian thing. That is so sterotypical. Not all asians are rich some have very modest incomes. Just becaause they haave Mc Mansions…doesn’t mean rich . They could be leveraged to the hilt. We live in a consumerist society…it’s not what we need it’s what we want now!

    The very fact that you think SUVs are good value shows your apitutude for investment. It depreciates in value once you drive it off the lot. You might want to check howw much your Plasma/ LCD Tv is worth now. You probably can’t get whaat you paaid for it. Same as your SUV.

    Condos are nice…good intrinsic value but still susceptable to demand and supply…there is an whole lot coming into the market in 09-10. The developers try to time it to hit the olympic crowd. There is no way they can retain there curreent value with such a vast supply and continually increasing credit restrictions.

    Credit cards a modern savings accounts…haave you seen the % they chaarge. Don’t pay your credit card for a few months . See how much you aare hit in extra payments. It’s an convenience.

    I ‘m aam asian by the way…like every other ethnic group there is rich and poor..

    But I probably just wasting my time. You believe the beach culture/ quality here is equivalent to the US california, Daytona, Venice…etc

    good luck with that

    Current score: -1
    Reply to this comment
  55. 173
  56. Keeping an Eye on The Pimps Says:

    Guess when this was said:

    “The continued strength of the real estate market is a reflection of the economic vitality seen throughout the province. With overall wages on the rise and unemployment in decline, buyers and sellers are left with a healthy and strong climate in which to operate,” says REBGV president Brian Naphtali.

    http://www.realtylink.org/what.....?news=0108

    Just keeping an eye on the pimps.

    Current score: 4
    Reply to this comment
  57. 172
  58. betamax Says:

    Most government workers need not worry I think.

    In the early 80′s govt. workers were forced to accept a 10% pay cut rather than the govt. laying off 10% of the workers.

    So they all kept their jobs, but a 10% cut hurts — and a similar cut now would really hurt, when people have no savings — i.e. they spend all they make and more.

    Current score: 4
    Reply to this comment
  59. 171
  60. there goes another idiot Says:

    Gadwin,

    you did not get the fact straight go attend the world summit where top leaders are trying to figure out how to put diapers on stock investor while home owners still own their house watching crunch on their high definition television.

    Also get these fact straight your math is wrong and self designed watch the forbes list next year only bill gates has managed to survive some how with his fakely claimed secure vista (still you need nortan as before),every one else is bleeding wake up dum head try to under stand whats going on around you basement hat.

    Current score: -20
    Reply to this comment
  61. 170
  62. Warren Says:

    Wow lots of Internet Tough Guys in here. IQ scores? Come on people. It seems like these interesting times bring out the worst in people. Drachen, how’s the air up there on Mt. Olympus? How do you tolerate us plebs and mouth breathers every day?

    And on the topic of Dave, he has a point of view, point out he’s wrong and move on, or ignore him. Who cares what he does? If he has an agenda it will show through. Certainly nobody on this blog is going to influence the Metro Vancouver RE market in any real way.

    Current score: 19
    Reply to this comment
  63. 169
  64. Gadwin Says:

    As for the discussion of stocks versus real estate, most people lose less on stocks than on real estate. The majority of people that purchase real estate will get a mortgage of some sort – that is, they need to borrow. When you borrow money for a mortgage, that is equivalent to going on margin for stocks in a long position.

    Ironically, most people don’t go on margin for stocks – they simply buy it with cash and hold (ie. think of all the mutual funds people own). Thus, if you include the real estate you own as part of your portfolio, then almost everybody’s portfolio is heavily weighted in the real estate they own.

    For instance, somebody that owns a $1 million dollar house may only have $100K in stocks. Now if stocks go down by 50%, this person loses $50K. But if real estate goes down by 30%, this person loses $300K.

    Unless you buy on margin, stocks can only ruin your current net worth. Real estate on the other hand will ruin your life 20 years down the road.

    For those specuvestors that are stuck watching their property values plummet, they will be paying for their mistakes 20 years down the road. If you’re a specuvestor, you need to cut price and get out of the market now because you know at heart, you’re losing that much more money as the real estate market plummets.

    Current score: 21
    Reply to this comment
  65. 168
  66. Stu Says:

    I took a mail order IQ test once, i paid for the more expensive one as it guaranteed a higher number. Smart people like cartoons.

    Current score: -4
    Reply to this comment
  67. 167
  68. John Says:

    Here’s some bull facts for you :
    1) The stock market has tanked completely. If you were a RE bear and invested in the stock market congratulations you lost 5-10 years of your life. Good job.

    2) Real estate remains one of the best investments out there. I own many condos and SUVs and it’s truly the best thing that’s ever happened to me.

    3) Credit cards and lines of credit are like modern savings accounts. If you don’t borrow at these rates you’re a fool.

    4) Rich asians are still rich. They were the ones who sold their stocks before the RE bears did. Now they’re buying condos. Meanwhile bears are still hungry.

    Current score: -10
    Reply to this comment
  69. 166
  70. VanTOVan Says:

    Economist article on China’s property crash

    My favourite tidbit:
    The Chinese press says that in September around 100 homeowners in the eastern city of Hangzhou stormed into the offices of Vanke, a big developer, to demand compensation for falling prices.

    Didn’t take the Chinese long to learn the Whiny School variety of capitalism, did it?

    Current score: 9
    Reply to this comment
  71. 165
  72. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    I remember visiting one of my friends who lives in Van West in the Spring of 2006. She and her family had been experiencing extreme financial difficulty due to health issues (the family breadwinner had suffered a debilitating accident). Well, on the day of my visit she had just returned from the bank and she was exuberantly dancing around exclaiming how wonderful the world was — how beautiful her neighborhood is, and so on and so on. It almost seemed like she had taken a euphoric drug of sorts. Well, apparently the bank is not treating her as well anymore — the family home of 25 years is up for sale.

    Current score: 3
    Reply to this comment
  73. 164
  74. Dave's Therapist Says:

    Please, folks, excuse Dave’s aggression. It is part and parcel of the realty check he is experiencing during this difficult time in his career.

    Dave: I’ll see you at 2 then?

    Current score: 0
    Reply to this comment
  75. 163
  76. Dave Says:

    FYI, my IQ = 155 (yes I’ve been tested)

    And you call me the blowhard?

    I am not so insecure that I feel I need to post my IQ or defend my intelligence.

    Current score: -8
    Reply to this comment
  77. 162
  78. Keeping and Eye on The Pimps Says:

    The bubble was fuelled by discouraging saving, printing money, and creating debt.

    Now the people are fed (pun intended), the myth, that if you discourage saving, by lowering interest rates further, and encourage more debt, that somehow things will right themselves.

    Oil is priced in the $60’s, down from the $140’s, copper, trees, and basic materials prices have crashed, the $cad is down by 20%, good paying jobs are disappearing, and being replaced by $15.00/hr jobs.

    Most people I know still can’t connect the dots; they think the housing troubles are just in Detroit, I was at a social gathering earlier this week, and the general consensus was that Vancouver RE might only appreciate 4 or 5% for the next couple of years, but should resume its upward trend thereafter.

    Bill Good, and his financial panel of experts, has done an incredible job of mass hypnosis.

    Current score: 14
    Reply to this comment
  79. 161
  80. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    looks like satv is back, only with a different name and he’s left his english mangler behind. very clear case of why we need the invisible tiny text feature.

    Current score: 4
    Reply to this comment
  81. 160
  82. Bubble Lad Says:

    Van Man speaks the truth.

    So much of the trauma and shock around this inevitable downturn is not people going broke, it’s people’s precious LIFESTYLES being threatened:

    Baby Boomers realizing they may not be able to retire at the age they wanted, live the way they did when they had steady income, travel around the world etc(you know all the crap they show in those “freedom 55″ commercials) – and their kids who (through no fault of their own) have been spoiled rotten by a boom economy and have come to expect a coddling job market and promotions, new cars, new clothes, vacations, and owning a house in your twenties or early thirties (all debt financed naturally).

    Economies cycle. Get used to it.

    Current score: 9
    Reply to this comment
  83. 159
  84. freako Says:

    More Gomez from the same 2005 report:

    “Thus, the only reasonable explanation for the outsized pace of price growth in Vancouver’s condo market is due to heightened expectations of future capital appreciation or put simply, speculation. For example, the user cost of capital suggests that a current condo “investor” in Vancouver is likely to be willing to accept below-fair-value rental yields since they assume that future price appreciation will cover the loss. It does not matter whether such an “investor” plans to flip the property in six months, one year or two years. All that matters is that an investor’s decision to buy has been predicated on expectations of significant future price growth – the exact definition of a price bubble.

    Potential homeowners are also capable of such speculation if they are willing to purchase a condo whose costs of ownership are greater than the cost of renting a comparable property. Again, this potential homeowner has made the decision to buy based on the belief that significant capital gains in the future will offset any losses incurred by not renting currently. ”

    Current score: 14
    Reply to this comment
  85. 158
  86. freako Says:

    Re: Carl Gomez.

    In 2005 he actually crunched some detailed numbers and said the following:

    “However, there is little justification for the double-digit pace of condo price growth beyond speculation (see below) suggesting that these properties may be at the heart of a potential housing bubble in Vancouver.”

    “Meanwhile, condo prices in Vancouver have been accelerating well ahead of what would be implied by the user cost of capital. In fact, even allowing for a generous 5 per cent ownership risk premium, the current rate of condo price appreciation is still about 10–15 percentage points faster than what it should be, suggesting that Vancouver’s condo market may now be at its most overvalued point in years. What is responsible for this situation?”

    Current score: 14
    Reply to this comment
  87. 157
  88. Dave's Therapist Says:

    Drachen: A bit of free advice — not a good idea to publicize your IQ. The average is 100 and 70 represents developmental delay. The standard deviation is 15, so 99% of the population fall between 70 and 130. To say that you are more than 3 standard deviations above average makes you, well, deviant in a way. It’s kinda like someone saying they have a penis the size of a baseball bat — we just don’t want to hear people bragging.

    http://tinyurl.com/2nv4t2

    Current score: 8
    Reply to this comment
  89. 156
  90. Ted Says:

    Anyone else notice this one didn’t sell? (Bet they appreciated the showing on the Global article!)

    V712572
    967 BEATTY ST
    155 days on market
    $467 per square foot

    Showings Friday October 24th 5-7 PM and Saturday October 25th 11-1 PM. Offers will be presented on Saturday October 25th by 5 PM. Don’t miss out on this great opportunity.

    Current score: 3
    Reply to this comment
  91. 155
  92. Only Dogs bark in recession Says:

    “I still stand by what I said:”

    fuck off

    forbes list of dummers like you just got disapear the only wealth they have got left is their real estate you fucking idiot no body is idiot like you- no fucking body.

    how do you like this math?fucking dum head

    Current score: -25
    Reply to this comment
  93. 154
  94. Dave's Therapist Says:

    Hi folks, I am Dave’s therapist and I would like to apologize for his behavior. You must understand that he is a realtor, and it is very common if not a requirement for realtors to suffer from a condition called delusional psychosis. They also tend toward narcissism. I am trying my best with Dave who I try to see for an hour a week. Most of my realtor clients, once they come to the realization that they have the delusional condition, due in part to the industry’s cult-like characteristics coupled with their own sense of insecurity and greed, will quit the profession and go on to try another career. We are seeing this happen in large numbers now because the market is forcing them to acknowledge reality and it is becoming more and more difficult for the delusional condition to grow and flourish. Please be patient as there are only so many therapists to go around and we are extremely busy these days with stressed home-sellers, stressed recent home-buyers and laid off construction workers and their families. Take care and remember that having financial security is the best cure for mental distress.

    Current score: 6
    Reply to this comment
  95. 153
  96. Drachen Says:

    Dave

    I was just trying to help you out buddy, I’m tired of seeing all the crazy speculation about you.

    FYI, my IQ = 155 (yes I’ve been tested)

    I don’t see what you could have found very insulting in the rest of that (is college educated an insult now?) nor do I see how any reasonable and intelligent person could think I was describing myself. The fact that you’re feeling insulted that I said you have an above average IQ says something about your personality though (OCD anyone? insecurity about your intelligence?).

    Current score: -7
    Reply to this comment
  97. 152
  98. DEFAULT NAME Says:

    Alexcanuck: You are so right. The market doesn’t lie. p.s. I like your name!

    Current score: 0
    Reply to this comment
  99. 151
  100. Patiently Waiting Says:

    Right on, scullboy. I’m looking at a career change and going back to school, and I’ve never been so thankful to be a renter with money in the bank.

    People are now going to discover how homoanership can remove their ability to escape the rat race and build a better life. Its a trap.

    Current score: 5
    Reply to this comment

Pages: « 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All

Customize your Avatar by registering your account email at gravatar.com