Welcome!
VancouverPeak.com- admin replied to the forum topic Sandbox. in the group Housing Data
- admin posted an update:
- jesse and Makaya are now friends
- jesse replied to the forum topic Sandbox. in the group Housing Data
- jesse posted an update: CMHC starts, completions and under construction in Vancouver […]
- The Ant started the forum topic BC Population Growth in the group Housing Data
- jesse and The Ant are now friends
- jesse and wreckonomics are now friends
- wreckonomics posted an update: New Year, New HPI. ”Selection Broadens and Demand Eases to […]
- Best place on meth and admin are now friends
Wordpress theme by Abhishek Tripathi of Mediawick Digital Solutions
November 13th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
John Furlong of Vanoc, tells how we could do our civic duty and help out during the Olympics buy shutting down some of our businesses, and take, or mandate holidays so that we can reduce congestion and perhaps volunteer our time.
I would like to volunteer to look after our female visitors “needs”; I prefer females early 20’S,
But will settle for mid 20’s if athletic and rich.
http://www.canada.com/vancouve.....6512eb7cd9
Sadly, there are fools who will actually go along with this.
Does anyone know if it is true that the Provincial Government will pay pablic servents to volunteer?
Does anyone know if they are looking for volunteers with my special talent?
November 13th, 2008 at 6:55 pm
“My next door neighbour has been trying to sell their condo for 4 months now. He bought it last year at $410K. He first listed it at $420K, then cut to $400K, then cut to $370K, then cut to $330K, and now it’s at $300K.”
What I’ve noticed:
I’ve been following a few, West Side, and I’ve seen one go from 399K to 325K. another on the same street is 319K, it would have gone for >400K at peak. So, the whole street has been pressured to re-price downward … problem is, no one is buying. Everything is just sitting.
Then there are the jokers who are just wasting time, like this 390sq/foot studio in Kits/Arbutus for 289K, hilarious.
November 13th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Dingus:
Not disagreeing.
Read the link below. Canada is mentioned as well.
http://network.nationalpost.co.....under.aspx
The pendulum swing of correction by desperate Gov’ts
In a reducto ad absurdum sense….too much of a good thing can be = too much of a bad thing.
November 13th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Dingus: Yes, of course debt can and is used wisely. But we appear to have a systemic collapse brought on by far too much bad debt. We CANNOT fix it! Either the debt get inflated away, or it gets defaulted away. Either way the current economic model is dead for a while, and we are in for a deep, nasty recession. Right now it looks like Mish is right, and we are in a deflationary collapse of debt.
A total freeze-up of credit markets is a very, very bad symptom to have in an economy. But it is a symptom, NOT THE DISEASE!
The ONLY people accepting more debt right now is the last ones you want to have it.
With my lack of ANY debt, and fair cash reserves I could singlehandedly make more contribution to the Vancouver Westside RE market than anyone in the past 12 days. (See post 685 at RJ’s, oops, sorry, Rob’s blog)
But I won’t!
November 13th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
alex and N-O
We are talking different things. Overextending and incurring debt that can’t be paid off is bad bad bad. But credit and debt aren’t evil or morally repugnant in and of themselves. What do you think happens to the money you put in a savings account, and why does it earn interest?
All businesses operate with credit, whether it’s vehicle or equipment leases, lines of credit, or financing of asset purchases. It’s not that scary. Imagine if you had to save up the entire cost of a house. Or if someone who wanted to start a business had to finance the whole nut through personal savings. Purchase all your equipment as a 100% outlaid capital cost. Collect your accounts before you pay salaries. It can’t be done.
One of the problems of the 30s was the people refused to take on debt at all and hoarded savings. Without liquidity in the system it seizes up. Spending and investment contracted and wouldn’t budge. Without that spending and investment, economic activity slowed, jobs were lost and not created, which led to even less spending and investment. Which led to less economic activity, which meant no jobs being created etc. It only started to improve with massive government spending to stimulate the economy (Tennessee Valley, the War). One criticism was that government didn’t intervene enough and early enough. This is no doubt on the minds of Bernanke, Paulson and Flaherty.
No question consumer debt and mortgage debt got out of control in the US, and mortgage debt in our fair town is likely the same for a lot of recent purchasers. The problem is those excesses have caused systemic problems in all debt markets, even those that were otherwise sustainable. Now here, those excesses are unlikely to cause the same systemic problems. Right now our financial system is simply suffering collateral damage to the US meltdown.
Anyway, trust me, if it people start missing a few paycheques or get laid off because their employer can’t access credit, there would be calls for the government to “do something”. They’re doing that something right now.
All of which is to say… I gotta lay off the afternoon Starbucks.
November 13th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Richard
Harper and Flaherty are such idiots. Yeah, great idea guys, let’s sell off national assets at a time when we’re sure to get bottom dollar for them simply for a short term political gain.
Good job Canada re-electing that pack of thieves.
November 13th, 2008 at 5:08 pm
LOL, things are so bad, the government is selling off Canada! Good find richard
November 13th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
Anonymous said
“My next door neighbour has been trying to sell their condo for 4 months now. He bought it last year at $410K. He first listed it at $420K, then cut to $400K, then cut to $370K, then cut to $330K, and now it’s at $300K.”
Your neighbour must have overpaid.
I don’t think we’ve hit 26.8% decline yet.
Did they destroy the unit or something?
November 13th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
considering selling national assets.
that can’t be good. i’d better stop reading the papers. all this bad news is starting to get to me. i guess we’ll all find out how bad it’s going to be soon. good luck everybody.
November 13th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
Like it or not, the economy runs on credit. When that credit evaporates, the engine seizes, and we’re back in the 30’s.
A scary thought indeed! But what if the old stories that warn against living on credit are true? It’s sure looking a lot like the lead-up to the great depression, which is what “they” are positive they can avoid this time. “They” also said we didn’t have a problem to begin with. “They” were wrong then.
Like it or not, what I see out there looks like what Mish is describing more than it looks like what “they” are repeating like a mantra.. What if he’s right?
Here is a key, older post on “Peak Credit”.
“Peak credit has been reached. That final wave of consumer recklessness created the exact conditions required for its own destruction. The housing bubble orgy was the last hurrah. It is not coming back and there will be no bigger bubble to replace it. Consumers and banks have both been burnt, and attitudes have changed.
It took nearly 80 years for people to get as reckless as they did in 1929. 80 years! Few are still alive that went through the great depression. No one listened to them. That is the nature of the game. The odds of a significant bout of inflation now are about the same as they were in 1929. Next to none.
Children whose parents are being destroyed by debt now, will keep those memories for a long time”.
Borrowing money is dangerous, and borrowing money to fund current consumption is a TERRIBLE idea. Yet collectively that’s what we have done. Worse yet, we borrowed it from our future selves! The debt we take on enters the economy (minus big , fat paychecks for the scam artists running the show), sloshes around a time or two, making the economy look fine in the current quarter/election cycle/average sheep attention span. The debt then parks itself in our house/RRSP/mutuals/etc value, which we use as collateral to borrow even more.
The FUTURE value of all those asset classes depends on the debt being paid down.
So if I owe myself a lot of money, and can’t pay, who’s problem is it?
Without that steady stream of new “money” entering the economy, we’ve been in recession for years. The whole economy is as unsustainable as Vancouver RE prices, for the same reasons, and the only question is when does the music stop. Mish is making a very compelling case that the music HAS stopped. Got a chair?
I have a comfy chair, and popcorn. It’s been 80 years since the last time this show hit the stage. I’m gonna like it.
And deplore it, and hope we can do better next time.
November 13th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
If it WALKS like a ponzi scheme ….TALKS like a ponzi scheme …and LOOKS like a ponzi scheme..it IS a ponzi scheme.
Of course the system runs on credit.
However, credit should be run like a control valve but not on par with a Titanic-esque leak .
Those at the top either took advantage of the situation or were ignorant of the potential.
The saying “Gov’t can NOT go broke ” was made a few decades back by an insightful party as the world became more and more addicted to credit and most at the top of the system who are often the greatest beneficiaries from such voodoo economics have never forgotten that Gov’t can NOT go broke.
November 13th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
My next door neighbour has been trying to sell their condo for 4 months now. He bought it last year at $410K. He first listed it at $420K, then cut to $400K, then cut to $370K, then cut to $330K, and now it’s at $300K.
Unfortunately, there are still no buyers! And to top it off, my neighbor says nobody has even come to look at his place in the last several weeks. He thinks its related to the financial crisis all over the media.
November 13th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
“If the $50 Billion bailout (or whatever you want to dress it up as), did NOT happen , then what?”
Well, possibly things like businesses not being able to tap lines of credit to make payroll, that sort of thing. The taxpayer “on the hook” is by definition someone that gets that paycheck.
Like it or not, the economy runs on credit. When that credit evaporates, the engine seizes, and we’re back in the 30′s.
But coulja calm down on the hyperventilating about ponzi schemes and such? This isn’t that complicated or nefarious.
November 13th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
Tony,
I thought i was here to assist you but you think totally opposite anyway before you lose your job lets get back to normal bussiness.
The Bank of Canada announced “measures to provide exceptional liquidity to the Canadian financial system” consisting of an additional $8 billion in short-term loans, and the Finance Department said it is prepared to purchase $50 billion more in mortgages from financial institutions.
http://www.canada.com/vancouve.....62aa3645a5
November 13th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Macchiato, yes I have kept the 15 Myth article and will post it as soon as I can find it.
It might take me a while.
November 13th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
Banks, Gov’t , CMHC..its the same Ponzi scheme
CMHC is a Crown ie Gov’t corporation.
Rob Peter to pay Paul ….or borrow from Melvin…or sell X or convert Y , fart blood , shit bricks, sacrifice your first born goldfish, whatever.
If the $50 Billion bailout (or whatever you want to dress it up as), did NOT happen , then what?
Its this type of governance structure that leads to creative accounting , subsidized by finger -pointing and hence delayed reaction re: inevitable consequences when the Ponzi scheme implodes.
November 13th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Tick Tock, Tick Tock
November 13th, 2008 at 3:03 pm
The fact that the mortgage buy back was announced during the election campaign proves this government is more interested in doing what’s right than what’s good politically. It freaked a lot of people out and even now probably has the worst optics of any move they could have made. Those who know how our banking system operates say that this move is a good one but to the average joe it sounds like a bailout.
As for the CMHC and it’s lax insurance requirements I think that’s the whole point of the CMHC. It’s a social program which encourages home ownership by allowing banks to give mortgages to people it normally wouldn’t lend to. It can never be done away with just like “free healthcare”.
November 13th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
15 myths … does anyone have that 15 myths article? I know some people downloaded the pdf. This is essential reading for bubbles future, would be great to put that up with some choice quotes on the wiki. Stage an area for Derrick Penner and some of the clowns he interviewed for that long piece.
November 13th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
It’s even funnier to read Krish/Time/Thums/Nobody when you know damn well he’ll be struggling just to feed himself over the next few years. Poor guy, hehe.
November 13th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
They should be acting countercyclically — encouraging demand during recessions and reigning in exuberance during booms.
Frankly I think Harper and Flaherty were trying to create a false boom a la their role models south of the border so they could ride their way to a majority on a claim of economic success.
Unfortunately the pyramid scheme collapsed before election day.
Read what Paul Martin has to say:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story.....artin.html
By the way this is the real link for the Canada Housing Trust article:
http://www.financialpost.com/s.....mp;k=20957
November 13th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
Also agree with patriotz on the CMHC criticism. Why CMHC was trying to stimulate demand in an unprecedented boom is beyond me. They should be acting countercyclically — encouraging demand during recessions and reigning in exuberance during booms. Recall David Dodge’s criticism back a year or so ago.
November 13th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Re $50 billion, ponzi schemes and screwed taxpayers.
Oy vey. This isn’t cloak and dagger stuff. The government is selling bonds so that it can purchase Bank owned mortgages through CMHC. This will result in the banks being able to raise cash to lend, other than through the previously “frozen”, (now merely “really freakin’ sluggish”) credit markets. The issue isn’t the solvency of the banks or their having poorly performing mortgages, it’s access to credit and freeing up cash to lend.
The government is not “bailing out banks” in the same way as in the US, where the government purchased swaths of poor quality and non performing loans. The mortage pool here is CMHC insurance backed. There is no more risk to the government than before if these mortgages turn into turds.
In fact, the taxpayer stands to gain, as low yield govt bonds are exchanged for mortgages with higher yields.
It’s necessary because of the seizing of the global markets for credit, not because of trouble at the banks to do with their lending practices or assets.
But clearly, that reality is drowned out in the current panic, especially as the initiative and the proportional dollar amount mirror the efforts in the US, and the wrong signal has been sent.
November 13th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
RE: How can it be that we’re doing a $50 BILLION bank bailout in Canada (over $1K each per man/woman/child in Canada) and this isn’t the biggest story in the country???!!!
Because it’s not a bailout. The mortgages were insured by CMHC (i.e. the taxpayer) at time of issue. The taxpayer is not taking on any additional risk.
CMHC has been doing this for years. Read up:
Canada Housing Trust products prove popular, Largest single issuer of fixed income securities
If people want to get upset about something, they should get upset that CMHC has been insuring default-prone financing such as 0/40, and the still unacceptable 5/35. Or that CMHC has been insuring mortgages at all, given that inflated house prices mean that there is too much capital going into housing, not too little.
November 13th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Re $50 BILLION
How many times has any of us been in a crowded room where a given issue has been tabled, people stare at each other, no one speaks out till a voice of reason breaks the ice ? Unfortunately too much of this goes on amongst the silent sheep majority and why the ” powers- that -be” usually win.
Throughout history has there ever been a wave of speculation in any commodity that has not collapsed? If this were not the case, we and future generations would all be rich off tulip bulbs and Bre-X stock etc.
Leaders throughout history have warned of the powers of the banking system, probably moreso than Eisenhower warned about the Military Industrial Complex. The problem is the Banks play the middle ground between us and the Gov’t to the point that banks are the actual Gov’t for all intents and purposes . However, unless the system changes, the banks will double dip to treat and pimp the general public as cash addicts, and then go crying to the Gov’t when things go south that the cash addicts have OD’d and are DOA….then the Banks cry to Gov’t for another cash injection. Question: Who’s the real puppet in this Ponzi scheme?
November 13th, 2008 at 11:24 am
“The cloak and dagger operations of the government with taxpayer money are really concerning.”
Buff Buttler,
How would you pay tax without job? Don’t you see buyers are not interested to buy at discount prices other side governments are spending TRILLIONS of dollars to save the countries?
so one way or another you must show up in OFFICE:You will pay taxes or MARKET:You will fuel the economy,if you are not present in one of these place you must be a jobless cummuter on earth or a contributer to see more than 100,000 jobloss in next 6 months.
There is a success in your hand you can use it or waste it,I know you don’t like to catch the falling knife so just chill out unless BOSS call you in office or your neighbourer come to surprise you.
November 13th, 2008 at 11:18 am
scullboy,
When you laugh at Krish, keep the following folk tale in mind, just to be safe:
“The town clown was always mocked by the townspeople for a peculiar ‘stupidity’ he repeated almost every day – when offered a 100$ bill or a 1$ bill to chose from, he would happily chose the 1$ and be super-excited about it ‘I am rich, I am rich, I have a dollar!!!’. And they would all laugh…
This repeated itself for many years. One day I felt sorry for him, and approached him silently: ‘krish, don’t be a fool. 100 dollars is much more than one dollar’ I said.
And he replied:
‘I might be the town clown, but I am not STUPID. Once I chose the 100$ bill, it’s the end of the one dollar bills”.”
Regards
arit
November 13th, 2008 at 11:13 am
Does anyone know where the newest Vancouver/Case-Shiller US City comparison graph is?
Somebody posted the link in the last week but I can’t find it now.
November 13th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Arit,
Don’t take this the wrong way, but if you’re going to compete for town clown, recall our very own winner of the Grand Prix des Idiots Blithering, Krrrish, does his act for free.
You’re funny but there’s no way to compete with the Google of window lickers.
November 13th, 2008 at 10:47 am
RE: How can it be that we’re doing a $50 BILLION bank bailout in Canada (over $1K each per man/woman/child in Canada) and this isn’t the biggest story in the country???!!!
Im glad someone else here is concerned about this. The cloak and dagger operations of the government with taxpayer money are really concerning. There not reporting anything anymore, its kind of rediculous… “oh by the way… we just grew the national dept by 15%” I know technically the money was already promised but its the principal of the matter. Say you are a venture capital company you need to report where *all* the money is going because it is infact not your money.
Similar case for the city of Vancouver council. I would replace every single one of them.
November 13th, 2008 at 10:31 am
Patriotz – I agree with you on the Ron Paul comparison. We may not all agree on his suggested solutions but at least he is out there trying to bring it to everyone’s attention.
Problem is we the voters. Voters continue to put more of the same in office. More empty promises. More short-sightedness.
Legalization is scary to some, I appreciate that. What’s scarier for me is voters putting new faces with the same ideologies, as in the past, back in power and expecting different results. I’m tired of it and I for one am ready for some outside-of-the-box ideas.
November 13th, 2008 at 9:19 am
MickeyFinn,
Thanks my friend. It does make me feel good, knowing that even if I am fired in the coming depression, I will always be able to earn a buck as the town clown!
Best regards,
arit
November 13th, 2008 at 8:49 am
Re: Mark Emery
Self -professed Libertarians like Marc Emery are often worth listening to once you get past the fog and the smoking banana smell. I have noticed that some candidates that run under the ” Marijuana Party” banner use it as a platform to bring good solid issues to the forefront, and not necessarily to promote legalization of what is curently prohibited.
Emery seems to cut to the chase and cut out the BS. I agree with his comments about the creeping police state…there is a un healthy mafia-like relationship between civic officials and the police. No one has ever proven to me that more money for police = safer society. Quite the contrary…, it is almost formulaic that throwing $$$ at a situation results in more paid civil servants than solutions, the illusion of greater public safety creates more of a false buzz than anything Emery sells. Police seem to be more interested in harassing innocent citizens re frivolous issues than addressing real crime.
I like his insightful comment about the Brits and the public surveillance security cameras…I heard recently the ratio was ONE public surveillance camera per 15 Brits ?
However,much of the survelliance is used for voyeuristic peeks , and the videos are of such poor quality that they often can’t be used in court?
When 2010 rolls around, watch that MEGA security bill come in. The original estimate was approx. $175 Million. I haven’t heard of a recent Olympics that didn’t have the final security bill come in at approx. $1 Billion. That lowball lie of $175 million was the first sign that lots of BS was going on behind the scenes. However,in these tough economic times, will the public have any appetite for any more lies and a bigger security bill ?
November 13th, 2008 at 1:29 am
#65 Sounds like someone I’d vote for. If only there wasn’t that whole pot issue that pretty much puts him out of the running.
November 13th, 2008 at 1:22 am
I haven’t met a single voter who cares about my issues, my perspective or asks my questions, so I am truly a gadfly this election. In the next three years, Vancouver will face an economic contraction, collapse, recession, that is unprecedented in the last 50 years.
Funny how it takes a fringe candidate to tell it like it really is.
Vancouver has found its Ron Paul.
November 13th, 2008 at 12:56 am
Marc Emery for Mayor, here’s an idea of where Mr. Emery sees Vancouver heading.
http://westernstandard.ca/webs.....mp;start=0
“Vancouver’s Future: The Frightening Truth
I haven’t met a single voter who cares about my issues, my perspective or asks my questions, so I am truly a gadfly this election. In the next three years, Vancouver will face an economic contraction, collapse, recession, that is unprecedented in the last 50 years. Construction activity will dry up in 2009 and more so in 2010. Retail stores will be closing in large numbers after this Christmas, and many businesses here have begun substantial lay-offs that will worsen in the winter and spring ahead. Rising unemployment, homelessness, business closings, will see greater pressure on charities, Food Banks, the Salvation Army. In the next two years, the auto industry, forestry, construction, retail, restaurants will all be suffering terrible reductions in activity. This means dramatically less tax revenues to the federal government, the province and city, as great a reduction in tax revenues as we have ever seen perhaps.
The perfect storm of unfortunate circumstances will batter this Boomtown. The Olympics are here in 15 months, and it couldn’t be worse timing. That will be the trough of the recession, the worst part. Revenue to the Olympics will be much less than anticipated, while Olympic over-runs are legacies guaranteed by the taxpayers of Vancouver and British Columbia. It will impact on the City’s budget perhaps up to $40 to $50 million dollars. The budget over-runs that Vancouver taxpayers are on the hook for is ominous and looming. The cost of one Olympic legacy project, the Trout Lake Ice Rink Replacement Project, has more than tripled, saddling Vancouver taxpayers with more than $10 million in extra costs. As a result, a community centre replacement has been put on hold. The City has also set aside a $20 Million Olympic Legacy Reserve, which is funding Olympic lights and Olympic banners. $20 million for banners and lights? Luxuries, surely.”
Sounds familiar.
November 13th, 2008 at 12:41 am
There are some golden Peter Simpson quotes from the Vancouver Sun that I captured on the wiki. I could find no reference to his August 2007 prognostications. If anyone can find the original link I would love to read it in all its prescient glory.
Though to be fair Simpson has been “surprised” by the level of building this year so I genuinely expect he shouldn’t be too “surprised” to see prices fall bigtime.
November 13th, 2008 at 12:28 am
Arit,
Firstly, I have to say that you’re too funny man… you have the best sense of humor of any poster on this site.
As regards your question about $4,500 monthly rent:
I actually know someone who pays that kind of dough for a very sweet three-level loft-style place on Water Street in Gastown (it has a roof-top patio as well which is sweet for summer evening parties).
However, the guy runs a digital effects company that he partially operates out of the same location and he sublets one room to another friend who also runs a business from the same address.
He has been in that location for three years but the novelty is apparently wearing off and he has recently suggested that he is looking for a cheaper place.
November 12th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
bdk 57,58,
your parents kitsilano home quadruple @ todays rates now you can borrow fourth part of it- interest free- and buy that coal harbour condo that should hook up quad core under quadruple then you can lend fourth part of it to your children then three genration can sit together and drink chai then say bha bai bha kya chai hai(wha brother wha what a tea).
November 12th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.....22126.html
November 12th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
But I still have to wonder why, if our banks are supposedly in such great shape (compared to their US counterparts) they still need a capital infusion like this.
They don’t, For example TD bond maturing 2015Oct30 has a YTM of 7.06%. That’s low by historical standards. There is no government guarantee on that BTW.
The banks are also having no trouble selling preferred share issues. And that’s equity – the holder has no claim to get his money back at all.
That’s the bond and stock markets saying that the banks don’t need help.
The government just wants to be seen to be “doing something”. Those mortgages it’s buying already carry a CMHC guarantee and the banks would have no trouble selling them on the open market with a yield similar to GOC debt, if CMHC allowed this (I’m not sure it does – CMHC makes money buying them itself and repackaging them).
November 12th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
“When someone promises to double your money in six months they are trying to trick you,” he said. “Nothing is free in this world and that is not going to change.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7726069.stm
November 12th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
nutslaps! today realtor leave me card and says it does “Now for being stuped and beliving in witchcraft you will have to work much harder to recoup the money you gave us.”
The offace of anothir realtrrr had a greetings card stuck on the door which read: “We wish you a sad Christmas and a shameful New Year.”
November 12th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Yeah nutslaps! I drink my chai tea yeah yeah!Read this writing on the wall”Vancouver Real Estate Go Down”no matter what bmo,rbc,ct ,real estate board with media combined has to say there is no piont other than current market volitilities bad ,Buy before March 2009 otherwise this same media will pop up to say opps now price go down 50% nobody now everybody say REAL ESTATE GO DOWN YEAH YEAH YEAH AND I DRINK MY CHAI TEA rbc,bmo,say yeah
“In extremely unstable markets there are usually no sellers, unless they are forced sellers, and no buyers,” he said.
yeah yeah! now realtor go
November 12th, 2008 at 10:54 pm
Thanks for the replies on the “bailout that isn’t really a bailout”. Reading those and thinking about it, I guess it’s not quite so bad. But I still have to wonder why, if our banks are supposedly in such great shape (compared to their US counterparts) they still need a capital infusion like this.
The article was low on details…are we going to see our banks use the money to pay out more hefty bonuses, like we’re seeing down in the States, or were there some strings attached to ensure that it actually frees up some credit as intended?
Seems to me an announcement of this magnitude deserves some more detailed reporting.
November 12th, 2008 at 10:53 pm
‘State of Condo Market’
Where is this and when?
November 12th, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Looking forward to hearing J-Pod’s presentation ‘State of Condo Market’ tomorrow. Wonder if the Q&A sessions will be barred like Tsur’s. Maybe I will just throw bread rolls at her evertime I disagree with her verbal diarrhea.
November 12th, 2008 at 10:26 pm
I love this line from Pete’s article:
Keep in mind editors, reporters and broadcasters have families, homes and the same financial commitments as other folks. They, too, worry about these uncertain times, but their jobs are to report events in a factual and balanced manner.
WOW! I havn’t seen much of this reporting since the bubble started and even became obvious to novus economists like me.
Hah, these knobhead experts still dont get it, the construction boom was a bubble, caused by speculative lending and so called investing. Fundamentals are returning (always do, always will), just hope my tax dollars arn’t blown away on reckless lenders and auto industry (this bugs the shit out of me). Government doesn’t think folks are going to foreclose on loans. I think we are all numb with figures from US bailouts, $80Billion doesn’t seem as bad as $700 billion plus. But what is the population of Canada?
November 12th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
“Peter Simpson, Special to the Sun”
Yeah, i’ll bet he’s Special to the Sun, alright.
And at the bottom it says
“Peter Simpson is chief executive officer for the Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association”
it’s in the newspaper, but i think it’s more an advertorial than anything else.
November 12th, 2008 at 10:09 pm
Peculiar happenings at Craigslist Rentals page
Yes indeed. Unfortunately, I think we are going to see rents slide in this city as predicted in the USA by at least one fund manager according to bloomberg:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/.....refer=home.
I say “unfortunately” because it would be the result of a very bad local and global economy.In South Granville I continue to see for rent signs popping up. The test will be how many rollover at month end. I have never seen that happen in this city. If it starts…look out below.