The Mortgage Bubble

Don sent in the link to this commentary on the mortgage market in the US and [the economy in] Canada.  Dave Rosenberg points out that there are some strange things happening in the spread between treasury bond yields and mortgage rates.

Once again, this Houdini recovery has involved a situation where mortgage rates have plunged and yet Treasury bond yields have been rising — 30-year fixed rate mortgages have fallen to 4.93% and are sitting are record-tight spreads over long Treasury bonds (see Chart 7). Historically, the average spread is 150bps and this differential is now 20bps. This is remarkable and our concern is that investors who may be exposed to mortgages are at serious risk because there is a considerable chance that these rates will be moving higher over the intermediate term — notwithstanding continued support from Uncle Sam’s pocketbook.

Investors must be reminded time and again that mortgages are callable, Treasuries are not; and we are now in a situation where net of fees, which average 70bps, anyone buying mortgage paper today is receiving a rate that is less than what the borrower is paying, How nutty is that?

He also comments specifically on the health of the Canadian housing economy:

All of a sudden, the Canadian economic data are coming a tad below expectations, including the 0.4% MoM advance in December retail sales, which just came up short from recouping the 0.5% decline the month before (revised from down 0.3%). Excluding autos, sales are running at a 2.1 % annual rate over the past three months, which can only be described as tepid in view of all the rampant monetary and fiscal stimulus percolating through the system.

Not only that, but the supply response in the Canadian housing market is beginning to, at the margin, alter the inventory balance. The number of new listings surged 4.0% in January and has risen sharply now in three of the past four months. After outpacing new listings over 90% of the time between January and October of 2009, sales has now lagged in each of the past two months and this has taken the sales-to-listing ratio down to 0.614x from 0.634x in December and the nearby October high of 0.683x (and now stands at its lowest level in eight months). Pricing is sure to follow suit. Better buying opportunities lie ahead for the fence-sitters, in our view.

David Rosenberg is the Chief Economist and Strategist at wealth management firm Gluskin Sheff.  Read the rest at Mish’s Global Economic Analysis.

RSS 2.0 comments feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

52 Responses to “The Mortgage Bubble”

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

  1. 52
  2. Poor Says:

    1. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has been insuring 0% down 40 year mortgages in recent years pouring gasoline on a housing market that was already on fire. Vancouver has become one of the most unaffordable cities in the world as a result of CMHC’s leadership in insuring speculative mortgages.

    2. Economic fundamental do not justify house price increases in the last ten years. House prices have gone up an average of 9% a year which is far in excess of 3% growth in incomes and 2% increase in employment.

    3. Mortgage debt ballooned from $431 billion in 2000 to $871 billion in 2008. This means in 2008 every man, women, and child in this country owed over $27,000 in residential mortgages. This is 60% more than the national debt for which each Canadian is on the hook.

    4. As an Agent of Her Majesty in Right of Canada, CMHC’s debt obligations and guarantees are direct obligations of the Government of Canada. This means taxpayers will foot the bill for up to $340 billion if CMHC tumbles.

    5. CMHC has been able to meet the minimum capital requirement by OSFI since 2005 but it still fails to meet the minimum international capital requirement set out in Basel Capital Accord II.

    6. Not only the government has failed to rein CMHC’s reckless risk taking behaviour, it has rewarded its management with hefty pay increases of 55% to 70% between 2001 and 2008 leading to a salary and bonus of $514,000 for its president in 2008 (See CN News, March 13, 2009, Top bureaucrat wages ‘obscene’ , By KATHLEEN HARRIS AND PETER ZIMONJIC, NATIONAL BUREAU) which is more than double that of any other deputy minister in the government of Canada. It is even more than the salary of Prime Minister for goodness sake. It is time to trim the hefty salaries of CMHC managers and pour that money into affordable housing.

    Current score: 3
    Reply to this comment
  3. 51
  4. SD92129 Says:

    @patriotz:

    Did you actually check out that book/link that you gave a reference to?

    Are You Missing the Real Estate Boom?: The Boom Will Not Bust and Why Property Values Will Continue to Climb Through the End of the Decade – And How to Profit From Them

    Some of the reviews are quite entertaining. Thanks.

    Current score: -1
    Reply to this comment

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

Customize your Avatar by registering your account email at gravatar.com