Lots of property to choose from

The news is getting out there about the rising real estate inventory in Vancouver:

“We are close to that level where the seller either has to discount or lower the price or take the listing off the market,” said local realtor James Wong of Sutton West Coast.

The Vancouver-based Malaysian who sells properties in the neighboring city of Richmond told Xinhua that not all sellers were desperate to sell and could possibly delist their properties.

“They just want to catch a good price for what is perceived to be the value of their home. But most of them at this point have already missed the peak,” said Wong.

Full story in the english version of Peoples Daily Online.

176 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DigginOut
DigginOut
10 years ago

Gordon C. Says:

And on July 31, you can tell us all how much more profitable the HST has made you.

Any expense dollars spent by a company that are HST eligible are now 7% cheaper, as they get the HST back.

Yes, if you only charge GST and now have to charge HST your customers are going to have to pay about 6.25% more than they did previously, but if this doesn't decrease your business, you're going to end up being better off with the HST recovered on the expenses you pay out.

patriotz
10 years ago

@Anonymouse:

This argument does not hold for investors in multiple properties who are simply selling off properties and not looking to re-invest… There are probably a lot of listings out there from investors looking to unload.

And WHY are they looking to unload? Because they see a bust coming, of course.

These people are not going to delist – they are going to drop the asking price until they get a sale. THESE are the people who drive the market down.

VHB is correct – almost all delists are from people who were going to buy another property.

trackback

[…] number of price reductions we’re currently seeing. Yesterday Paulb shared numbers that showed 232 new listings and 56 sales, but nearly 3 times that number of price changes at […]

buff_butler
buff_butler
10 years ago

@“A-Sharp” Accountant:

“-We have rich foriegners so it wont crash”

This is awesome that you posted this. Every city I’ve been in seems to have this mysterious and ambiguous group of out of towners that are running up the price. The funniest so far was Calgary had rich people from Kelowna and Kelowna had rich people from Calgary.

buff_butler
buff_butler
10 years ago

@sluggo: I dunno, sure dave likely posts sometimes to “stir the pot.” At the same time he seems to be a good debater and good conversation typically ensues with his involvement (ex. look at this thread).

Newcomer
Newcomer
10 years ago

WaPo gets it wrong. It's amazing how a reputable paper could print such garbage.

http://tinyurl.com/39asoax

jesse
10 years ago

According to some of the regular posters at House Hunt Victoria, Victoria sales are cratering.

Gordon C.
Gordon C.
10 years ago

Well, not much of a name; You contradict yourself so many times through out this HST thread, its difficult to discuss this with you. I'm guessing (because I have to as you are unclear through out) that you sell retail products. Where the HST has a new affect is on service industries. The accountant, the barber, the plumber, the real estate agent. They now will charge an additional 7 percent on their services in addition to the current 5%. But somehow, in your world, they make more profit? Well, then by extension why not raise the HST to 50% and we will all be rich. Your retail business already pays PST and GST of 12 percent, and on July 1, you will pay 12% HST. So how has this made you more profitable? Afterall, clients will not want you not… Read more »

oneangryslav2
oneangryslav2
10 years ago

Take a look at the weekly new home sales (US) graph at the link I provide below. A few weeks back, some of you bulls ridiculed the concept of "moving demand forward." Check out the last six months of the aforementioned graph and you'll see a textbook example. Why did sales spike in the first few months of the year? Government policies that were temporary in nature. What did this do? Well, the increase in sales were not the result of extra demand; they were the result of individuals who were always wanting to buy, finding it economically rational–following the announcement of the policy–to purchase before, rather than after, the policy deadline.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/06/worst-home

vibe
vibe
10 years ago

Anonymouse,

CMHC insurance covers the lifetime of the mortgage. So underwater owners will still get renewals without extra cash (since the bank has no risk). If they sell and move up they will need to pay the difference to the bank as well as come up with a down payment for the new place.

crashcow
10 years ago

@“A-Sharp” Accountant: You'll enjoy this interview…Now's the "Absolute Best Time" to Buy a Home: Coldwell Banker CEO

Tech Ticker: "I have never heard you or anyone in the real estate industry warn people 5 years ago that prices look frothy. You've been in the business for 35 years. Was there anytime in those 35 years that you would have told people that now is NOT a good time to buy a house?"

Coldwell Banker CEO: "Uuuummm. No. But I have never been able to say that now is the BEST time."

HAHAHA!!!

Dave
10 years ago

@Whitebear:

Let me guess… gold?

Absinthe
Absinthe
10 years ago

@Anonymouse: From my vantage point, the catastrophe has *already* happened to Vancouver. We have the most unaffordable real estate in the world. It's costing the city in ways greater than just the cost of RE.

Anonymouse
Anonymouse
10 years ago

@VHB: Oh I missed the context of move up buyers. Since the topic today is about HST I have to say I've been getting a kick out of some of the developer advertising. I saw one ad along the lines of "hurry beat the HST" only to look at the prices and find that they were condos in the $300k range, in which case the implementation of HST has no impact. For a nanosecond my thought was "stupid developer" but then I realized the genius of it. Since a smart buyer would realize that the advertising was B.S. the developer was essentially targeting the dumb gullible potential buyers. These types of buyers are easier to sell to. Although I guess the HST would apply to any broker fees, legal and closing costs but I can't imagine this would add up… Read more »

Whitebear
Whitebear
10 years ago

@VHB As I’ve said earlier, if anything, the more despair the US housing market, as evidenced by today’s headline that new sales in the US dropped 33%, the more desperate the US administration will be. That’s why it came back to what the following author had to say. http://tinyurl.com/343lg8t Again, no one said this is the right approach but it’s logical to assume that desperate governments commit serious mistake that will haunt everyone for the foreseeable future. The housing market over the years is all about the ballooning of debt. In fact, the drop of the US housing market coincides with the collapse of the higher powered money like the M2 or M3. And, the reason that housing still sucks so much in the US is because the money that bailed out the banks are still sitting as extra reserves,… Read more »

Spec
10 years ago

Even creepy mansion sales are down!

http://tinyurl.com/36dfg8n

VHB
VHB
10 years ago

BTW, today's 56 sales is the LOWEST daily sales figure this year in my records going back to March 2nd.

VHB
VHB
10 years ago

@Anonymouse: You're right. My post was about move-up buyers.

ulsterman
10 years ago

@realpaul:

Yes, Realpaul that's right. After 5 years of post-secondary education those parasites demand the outrageous sum of $45,009 to start teaching your children. Un-fucking believable! Greedy parasites! I'm mean, what with the paid overtime they all "claim" to be doing after 3pm they must all be making six figures! Ban teachers i say!

What's that? They don't get paid overtime? Oh, in THAT case i must respectfully disagree with your position on this one.

Superfly
Superfly
10 years ago

Holy cow!

350 sales so far this week, will there be under 600 for the week (low 700s last 2 weeks)?

This would be a monthly rate of 2500 or MOI of 8!

Anonymous
Anonymous
10 years ago

@oneangryslav2:

It's easy for all bears to say. Yeah, it's also easy for me to say in 2010. However, when you want to buy a certain house or condo to move up to, you want to get the maximum price you can get from the current house.

Psychologically, it's not that simple for homeowners to just lower the asking price.

Anonymouse
Anonymouse
10 years ago

@VHB:

[quote]SO, what this means is that every single time one of these guys delists, there is a corresponding and commensurate decrease in the number of people looking to buy. The supply decrease is exactly offset by the demand decrease.[quote]

This argument does not hold for investors in multiple properties who are simply selling off properties and not looking to re-invest. Nor does it hold for sellers moving out of this market to another. There are probably a lot of listings out there from investors looking to unload. So there is no offset of supply and demand in these cases.

chopper
chopper
10 years ago

@Not much of a name…: sorry man, you're out to lunch on this one. right now the PST collects roughly $6B a year in revenue in BC. This is going to jump to $20B a year in revenue, yes that's correct $20B. Trust me, I know this from an inside source. It's got f*** all to do with increased corporate taxes from lower input costs. It's a cash grab, plain and simple.

"A-Sharp"
"A-Sharp"
10 years ago

Best 5 minutes you will ever read. the NAR writing research reports convincing americans (in 2005) that there will be no decline in Phoenix.

It's all there

-We have low interest rates so it wont crash

-We have rich retirees so it wont crash

-We have rich foriegners so it wont crash

-Price/rent and Price/income does not matter

-The economy is strong

-Buy now or be priced out forever.

Compare directly with Gregory Klump's analysis.

http://web.archive.org/web/20051126141240/www.rea

The NAR was either using Jimtan's model, or was looking out of the wrong end of the telescope.

Anonymouse
Anonymouse
10 years ago

@VHB: [Quote]I enjoyed the back and forth with the anonymous 24 year old professional yesterday. Anyway. One bit he said deserved more scrutiny: Two errors here. 1) **CMHC will keep up its lending practices during a bust.** No. CMHC, like all insurers, give you umbrellas on sunny days and take them away when it rains. Once CMHC posts its first big losses, they will tighten their lending criteria. Goodbye 5% downpayments. Yes, the horse will already be out of the barn, but they will be under huge pressure to ‘do something’ to staunch the bleeding of their balance sheet. Credit **tightens** in a downturn; it doesn’t loosen. 2) **it can’t happen because it would be a catastrophe; I don’t want it to happen**. Sorry, kid. What you ‘want’ is irrelevant to what will happen. Also, yes, it would be a… Read more »