Whistler or bust? posted this list of reasons they think the top is in for the Vancouver real estate market. What do you think?
10 Reasons why am I calling a top now
1. Vancouver Real Estate has finally gone parabolic. It has gone from years of above average price increase to massive never before appreciation. No asset class that I am aware of has ever gone parabolic or hockey stick on a chart and not had a major crash. Not tulips, oil or tech stocks. This is textbook classic top – Greed has replaced Fear and it’s different this time for ______ and _______ has replaced rational thinking.
2. Panic buying and large price increase have spread to the distant suburbs such as Maple Ridge, Places where there is plenty of buildable land and lots of new inventory. Places are going multiple bids in average neighborhoods. People genuinely think if they do not buy now they will be priced out forever.
3. Real Estate prices in the vast majority of BC are flat to down. Its as if the Lower Mainland is an island onto itself. These are areas not affected by HAM or DAM so it better reflects the current economic fundamentals of the real estate.
4. The Canadian and BC economy is weak. There is risk that the spill over of falling oil prices will spread to Vancouver. This can be in the form of layoffs at West Jet or the CIBC because they have to cut costs due to losses on loans to oil companies. This is a bigger thing than many people think. Continue reading 10 reasons the top is in for Vancouver real estate
What would you call a 20 year old 7300 Sq foot house with brand new hardwood floors and an indoor pool?
In Vancouver we call that a tear down.
Property records show that the 7,300-square-foot house was last sold in 2013 for just over $6 million — the assessment today is $7.44 million. According to the 2013 listing for the property, it boasted $350,000 in recent renovations including new hardwood floors, a water purification system and windows. The listing sheet shows the two-storey house on a corner lot has 19 rooms including seven bedrooms, a media room, office and 12-foot by Seven-foot walk-in closet off the master suite.
…Well, we certainly know how to keep bulldozer operators and city dump workers employed!
Read the full article here.
Patriotz pointed this out in the weekends open topic thread:
Tomorrow there will be provincial by-elections in Van Mount Pleasant and Coquitlam Burke Mtn. Both former MLA’s ran in the recent federal election – for the NDP (won) and Conservatives (lost) respectively.
What do the candidate websites have in common? None of them have anything to say about housing. For example in Coquitlam Burke Mtn which is the only real contest:
However I think this bizarre paragraph by Issacs on “Sharing Economy, Growing BC Tech” is notable:
I will advocate for a Sharing Economy to optimize new services for families – the Ubers, the AirBnBs, the Lyfts. A diverse economy means being open to new ideas and technologies. A Sharing Economy encourages the tech sector in BC, which helps create jobs and generates investment. It starts by giving British Columbians the freedom to participate as entrepreneurs or consumers or both!
So BC’s high tech future is operating your car as a taxi or your house as a hotel!
It’s that time of the week again…
Friday Free-for-all time!
This is our regular end of the week news round up and open topic discussion thread for the weekend – here are a few recent links to kick off the chat:
–The bank will pay your mortgage
–The illusion of equity
–More cutting by Poloz?
–Bubbles and crying wolf
–The kids are all right
–HSBC stops some china US mortgages
–Prices up beyond wages
So what are you seeing out there? Post your news links, thoughts and anecdotes in the comments section below and have an excellent weekend!
As the economy deteriorates further Canadians are sitting on a pile of cash. Stock portfolios are holding a record $75 billion in cash.
How do you get people spending and investing again?
Well, you could try negative interest rates.
That kinda worked in the EU. Denmark has driven down their currency which has helped exports. Of course the flip side of negative rates is the risk of housing and stock bubbles.
But how would negative rates most likely affect Canadian consumers? Higher fees.
“What you might see happening is a negative interest rate masquerading as higher fees,” Milevsky said. “No bank in their right mind would tell a consumer, give us your hundred dollars and we’ll give you 95. That will never happen.”
Read the full article here.