Archive for the ‘debt’ Category

Preparing for falling prices

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Canadian Mortgage Trends has an article about getting your mortgage approved before prices fall.

When home prices do fall, it makes it tougher for certain people to qualify for a mortgage—especially for refinances. When prices start dropping, appraisals come in lower, insurer valuation systems become more conservative, and lenders tighten up in general.

Vince Gaetano, a broker with Monster Mortgage, tells the Financial Post that people are already trying to get approved “before there is a correction in the real estate market.”

Of course prices may fall in the rest of Canada, but we all know they won’t fall here in Vancouver right guys?

Backing away from the Bid

Monday, June 28th, 2010

We posted this in the free for all, but it’s worth taking a closer look: Eleven pre-sales buyers at the Vancouver Olympic Village are unhappy with their units and are trying to get out of their contract. They complain about changes to plan and faulty fireplaces. Presales contracts of course always favor the developer, and these issues aren’t enough to break the agreement, so the approach their lawyer is taking is to claim that the City of Vancouver took over as developer. Since they aren’t listed on the paperwork this would be a technicality that could nullify the contract. If they manage to make this argument work and other buyers want a way out of their purchases it could be more trouble for the O.V.

The buyers put down deposits of between $60,000 and $300,000 for False Creek condos priced from a low of $550,000 to units that sold in the millions of dollars.

They’re being asked to close their deals by the end of the month.

On Thursday, Baynham filed writs in B.C. Supreme Court against developer Millennium Water on behalf of six of his clients, who have addresses in Vancouver and West Vancouver.

Baynham says the City of Vancouver is the owner of the property, after bailing out Millennium when it couldn’t get financing. But that’s not disclosed in the sales agreements, he says, so the contracts are invalid and should be rescinded.

The city argues that Millenium still owns the project and is the developer, the city is simply the bank.

We saw a lot of pre-sales buyers try to walk away from their contracts during the mini-crash a few years ago, and developers suing the for the difference between their deposit and the current market value. It’s interesting that these buyers are trying to get out of their contracts while the stats still show that Vancouver property prices are still at an all-time record high.

What are they smoking?

Monday, June 14th, 2010

One reason Canadian cities can never have a housing bubble like they had in the US is that our lenders are much more diligent and properly manage risk. At least that’s what I heard, so you can imagine my surprise when I read this article where two different Canadian banks gave mortgages to a grow op owner with no proof of income:

Alarm bells should have gone off the moment Hai Le walked into the Bank of Montreal and asked to refinance the mortgage on his million-dollar home in Vancouver’s up-and-coming Marpole area.

His alleged inability to provide proof he had the means to make the hefty monthly payments of about $4,000 should have been reason enough to crumple up and toss the application into the nearest trash can.

Le, a “sales manager,” was also asking the bank to mortgage the property for its full value, a strategy that authorities say marijuana growers often use to minimize their losses should and when they get busted.

Yet despite these blatant red flags, the bank approved Le’s application for a $976,000 mortgage on Oct. 22, 2008, some 15 months after he’d bought the house from a Viet Van Truong for $980,000.

Ten months after the purchase, in August 2009, Vancouver police raided Le’s West 63rd Avenue home and uncovered a massive grow-op. Two days later, Le sought and received a $70,000 mortgage from the Royal Bank of Canada.

The Forefeiture Office is now seeking to have the mortgage proceeds seized from the bank. Read the full mind-boggling article in the province. Thanks to Jimmy for the link!

Debt fears worry investors

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

No, not the little half-million dollar mortgage debt you may be carrying, I’m talking about the big debt. Government debt. Everybody’s doing it, but there isn’t a lot of comfort in the numbers right now. Investors around the globe are showing more and more fear of big unmanageable debt loads and defaults.

A recent report out of BMO Capitol Markets goes so far as to recommend moving into ‘cash or cashlike instruments‘.

So lets presume you’ve got money rather than debt. What are you doing to protect it and make it grow? Are you moving into or out of equities or are you burying it in a jar in the backyard?

Financial advice for mortgage rates

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Woodrow pointed out this excellent article over at News1130.com on how to get a good deal with these new high interest rates. Here are a couple of gems:

The easiest thing to do is to put down a larger down payment, which will help you pay less interest over the life of your mortgage — or make payments weekly or bi-weekly.

Well that’s easy! Just put down more money! But what if the credit card companies won’t let me take out another cash advance? Do you have any other advice on how to save money on a mortgage, perhaps in a jumbled form?

Bank of Montreal’s Carolyn Heaney says within in the next couple of years we’ll see more increases in the prime lending rate, so people may want to consider a fixed rate mortgage. “Let’s say we take an average 30 year and reduce it to 25, how much interest can we potentially save off on a $200,000 mortgage? The answer to that is roughly around $53,000.”

Heaney explains another thing people can do is cut their amortization by five years, from 30 to 25. She says potential homeowners can save over $50,000 on a $200,000 mortgage.

..Perhaps we’re all just too busy flipping condos to edit the news?

Interest rates up, prices down

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

That’s right, the Bank of Canada just DOUBLED the overnight rate, which would be oh so much more impressive if we weren’t starting at .25%

The overnight rate is now one half of a percentage point. Was it in anticipation of these new dramatically higher interest rates that the Average Vancouver house price dropped by about $45,000 last month?

And how are the banks reacting? By dropping mortgage rates to give you “one last chance” at the easy money. But Check out Mr. Mark Carney, he’s all “caution this and caution that“. Rock bottom rates may be with us for some time yet!

I know many bears out there are dreaming of the American bubble situation, where house prices plummet AND interest rates stay near record lows. Could it happen in Vancouver?

Reviews of the Rollercoaster

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Tickets are still available to the Vancouver Real Estate Roller Coaster. Critics are calling it the Summer blockbuster that’s not to be missed!

“..a useful image when thinking about asset prices in general today and always. Human behaviour and leverage drive our asset price cycles. If we always keep the roller coaster image in mind, we will never be able to relax and fall asleep after a period of very steep climbs; nor will we be as inclined to throw in the towel after a period of very steep falls.”

Danielle Park – Juggling Dynamite

“..a wonderful illustration of financial storytelling. Metaphor can be a wonderful tool, the reason this one works is that it takes an over used cliché and makes it real.”

Stewart Marshall – Financial Storyteller

“A vomit inducing ride.”

The Georgia Straight

“The only thing I had a problem with is that [it implies] what really is going to happen is we’re going to fall off the roller coaster and sink into the water. Investments are volatile. If you want low volatility then buy low-volatility GICs.”

Tsur Sommerville – UBC Center for Urban Economics and Real Estate

Household debt levels threaten recovery

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Household debt levels in Canada are at record levels, higher than Greece. The Canadian reaction to recession has been to take on more debt, which has some worried about the impact that will have on our economy going forward.

Household debt has more than doubled from 1989 levels and now stands at a record $1-trillion – or $1.47 for every dollar of disposable income. With the Bank of Canada expected to raise interest rates, perhaps as early as next week, vulnerable Canadians could soon find themselves emptying their pockets to cover higher interest payments.

“The high rate of household indebtedness is a source of risk” to the Canadian economy, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development cautioned in a report Wednesday. It noted that household debt has swelled further in recent months – an unusual development. People usually save during recessions.

Read the full article in the Globe and Mail.

The ‘good banks’ myth

Monday, May 24th, 2010

Observer pointed out this blog article over at the Vancouver Sun, which does an excellent job of rounding up some of the issues we’ve gone over about the CMHC and the Canadian Banking system:

Not only has the Harper government felt it necessary to prop up Canadian banks it was this same government which created financial system risk in the first place. In 2007 the Harper government allowed US competition into Canada which prompted the CMHC to dramatically change its rules in order to compete: it dropped the down payment requirement to zero per cent and extended the amortization period to 40 years. In August 2008 Flaherty moderated those rules in response to the US mortgage meltdown. CMHC then “securitized” an increasing number of its loans into bond-like investments (if you have a typical Canadian mutual fund, you’ve got some.)

At the end of 2007 there were $138 billion in securitized pools outstanding and guaranteed by CMHC –17.8 per cent of all outstanding mortgages. By June 30, 2009, that figure was $290 billion and by the end of 2010 it was $500 billion.

Read the full article, it’s full of interesting facts and figures.

BC quarterly sales drop more than 25%

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Landcor data is out and in the first three months of 2010 both the number and value of BC real estate transactions dropped more than 25% from the previous quarter.

The results quantify the trend economists such as Cameron Muir, chief economist for the B.C. Real Estate Association, have observed occurring since January.

Landcor’s numbers “certainly support the data we’ve been looking at that shows that obviously the pace of sales have slowed since the last quarter of 2009,” Muir said in an interview.

Last year’s “fourth-quarter peak is unlikely to reoccur in 2010.”

Landcor president Rudy Nielsen said B.C. home sales typically slow at the beginning of the year, but the first-quarter of 2010 slowed more than usual compared with the last decade of results. This is in part, he believes, because of the Olympics.

Nielsen added that consumer uncertainty over a host of issues, ranging from the global economic situation to unknown effects of the harmonized sales tax, have consumers sitting on their wallets.

Meanwhile in Canada, the CMHC is predicting that prices will rise ‘moderately’ in the next couple of years:
The agency, which insures almost $500-million of Canadian mortgages, said the average cost of a home by the end of 2011 should be $350,000. That would be a gain of 1.4 per cent over April’s record high of $344,968.
Forecasting higher prices next year puts the agency at odds with the Canadian Real Estate Association and Toronto-Dominion Bank, both of which are calling for prices to drop by 1.5 per cent and 2.7 per cent respectively in 2011.
The Globe and Mail might want to check their numbers.  Canadian taxpayers are responsible for HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS in CMHC mortgages, not ‘$500-million’.

It has been difficult to accurately make forecasts on the housing market through the recession, however. Its forecast for 2009 housing starts was off by 19.4 per cent. The agency was only off by 1.5 per cent the previous year, and its goal is to always be within 10 per cent of the actual figures.

“For the first time in several years, our forecast accuracy was not within the 10-per-cent range because of volatile market conditions,” it said.

A ten percent margin of error eh?  Coincidentally Dan in Calgary points out that the phrase ‘CMHC is forecasting’ is a perfect anagram for ‘Comic things, farces

Wordpress theme by Abhishek Tripathi of Mediawick Digital Solutions