Vancouver Condo Info

This from today’s Globe and Mail - Canadian house prices dropped in June for the first time in nine years:

Canadian home prices fell in June for the first time since January, 1999, as the number of houses for sale remained at record levels.

The average price of an existing home fell 0.4 per cent in June to $341,096, compared with $342,615 the year before, according to statistics released Tuesday by the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA).

“The fall in home prices…is a sizable dip in this indicator, given that not too long ago the Canadian housing market was witnessing double-digit price gains,” Millan Mulraine, economic strategist at TD Securities Inc., said in a research note.

Of the 25 major markets included in the statistics, average home prices declined on a year-over-year basis in Calgary, Edmonton, Victoria and Windsor-Essex. The largest decline of 2.6 per cent was in Edmonton, while the smallest was in Windsor-Essex at 0.5 per cent.

Last month, BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. economist Douglas Porter raised the possibility of an overall drop in home prices in Canada. Most industry watchers have stayed with the view that home prices will rise slightly this year.

In June, Mr. Porter said it was “unnerving” to note that Canada’s housing market performance appears to be tracking that of the U.S. but with a two-year lag, although he also sees a number of differences between the two markets.

He said he was tracking prices in the “middle ground,” cities such as Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa, which still have fairly robust economic fundamentals but haven’t been supercharged by the commodities boom.

Prices in those cities all rose moderately year-over-year in June, up 3.7 per cent in Toronto, 4 per cent in Montreal and 6.8 per cent in Ottawa.

The Canadian and U.S. markets are still very different, CREA president Calvin Lindberg said in a statement. U.S. home prices dropped by 14.1 per cent in the first quarter of the year, according to the benchmark Case-Shiller national home price index.

Out local market stands out as the biggest year-over-year decrease in sales in all the Nation, Greater Vancouver saw sales drop 42.9% from last June.

 Loading …

The CBC is reporting that two Concord Pacific condo towers in downtown Vancouver have developed leaky condo problems requiring millions in repair work. The ‘leaky condo issue‘ is very familiar to Vancouver residents, and apparently still very much a concern.

Governor’s Tower at 388 Drake St has required replacement of all windows, exterior walls and bricks which has cost owners at least $100k per unit:

The cost of repairs to the tower was estimated at $29 million, and each of the 237 condo owners had to fork over at least $118,000, with the cost depending on the size of their apartments, Fox said.

Governor’s Tower was built 14 years ago and the 10-year warranty had expired.

The Parkview Tower at 289 Drake street is the other Concord Pacific tower reported with this issue:

All the windows on the 14-year-old tower were replaced because they leaked, said Alan Cadwell, whose Langley-based company, The Condo Advocate, repaired Parkview Tower.

Cadwell’s company specializes in restoration management for leaky condos in B.C.

“With one good push, the window wall system, in theory, could be kicked out and could be travelling to the floor,” Cadwell said of the condition of the windows.

The cost of the repairs for Parkview Tower amounted to more than $8 million, he said.

Thanks to LaLaLand and Bizznitch for the story tip and link.

UPDATE: In a bit of synchronicity the Vancouver Sun has this article in todays paper: Leaky condo crisis far from over.

By 2012, when the leaky condo era enters its fourth decade, as many as one-third of the defective units will remain unrepaired, said the report, prepared for the province’s Homeowner Protection Office (HPO) by private consultants.

At least 45 per cent and possibly as many as 68 per cent of leaky buildings have not been repaired yet, according to various scenarios explored by the consultants.

…

The consultants made no attempt to estimate the total cost of the damage, but concluded that early estimates of the repair cost per unit - $10,000 to $15,000 - were way low.

“Based on the HPO experience, it would appear that the actual average repair costs are approximately five times or six times higher,” they said.

By last September, repair loans the HPO makes to leaky condo owners had grown to an average of $62,000 for wood-frame apartments, and $72,000 for those in concrete buildings.

North America isn’t alone in struggling with the combined challenge of inflationary pressure and economic stagnation.  The fed recently decided to keep interest rates steady, while in the UK they are edging up.  At the same time the ‘credit crunch’ is being blamed for a downturn in Britain as retailers and house builders start to report problems:

The credit crunch hit the high street with a vengeance yesterday as shock figures from Marks & Spencer wiped £4 billion off the value of Britain’s leading retailers.

The grim news from Middle Britain’s favourite store marked a new phase in the economic downturn and threatens the high street with its worst slowdown in 20 years. Adding to the gloom, one of the country’s biggest housebuilders revealed that it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Taylor Wimpey’s value more than halved after it failed to secure rescue funding and said it would cut 900 jobs.

As the global economy is faced with more challenges can BC stay unaffected?

On a side note it’s interesting to see how competition from other locales is showing up in our housing market.  I’ve noticed recently that the ‘for sale’ section of craigslist has been listing a number of properties in Arizona, Florida, California & Ontario.

-thanks to JB for the Times story link.

This is a pass-off post to Paul Boenisch at nvcondos.ca who has just posted some dramatic month-end June stats on his blog.

If you haven’t seen these numbers yet, or if you have any doubt that the Lower Mainland real estate market is undergoing a dramatic shift, check them out now.  Supply continues to grow while sales keep dropping.

Here are a few highlights:

Sales down 41% from June 2007
Inventory up 53% from last year
North Vancouver inventory up 113%

Check out Paul’s blog for all these stats and more graphed out for some dramatic visuals.

So far prices haven’t been impacted much at all, but increasing supply and decreasing demand will put pressure there unless this dramatic shift reverses soon.  Could we be in danger of tracking the US market?

Renewed concern over an old mortgage fraud problem has been in the news lately and that attention has people flooding the title office with calls from homeowners.  Last Friday the Vancouver Sun reported the story of a Retired Richmond man who discovered his house had been sold without his knowledge and a large mortgage taken out on the home:

It’s all part of an elaborate scheme that has surfaced recently in B.C. in which con artists are attempting to sell homes without the owner’s knowledge, leaving the homeowner off the title but with hundreds of thousands in new mortgage debt against the property.

In the latest variation of the scheme in B.C., a would-be seller contacts a notary or lawyer to carry out the sale of a home.

A buyer, who is thought to be in on the deal, applies for a mortgage on the property and if the transfer is successfully carried out, the mortgage funds are paid to the seller. The buyer and seller disappear and so does the money, often leaving the homeowner to discover the ruse only when the bank notices the mortgage payments aren’t being made and comes looking for its money.

While such fraud is not new, title insurance company First Canadian Title said B.C. has seen a jump in suspicious cases this year. And a B.C. Supreme Court decision this month ruled that while a true owner could regain title to a property if it was fraudulently transferred, mortgages taken out on the property — even if fraudulently obtained — still stand.

Unfortunately the only way to discover that you are a victim of this sort of fraud is by checking records with the title office, which has set off this recent flood of calls:

“A lot of people have been wanting information, and the calls are backed up for at least a day,” Ian Smith, director of land titles for British Columbia and registrar in the Land Title and Survey Authority’s New Westminster land title office, said Wednesday. “We had 180 I believe yesterday, and that was just in the New Westminster office.”

Meanwhile, the authority launched an appeal to a recent B.C. Supreme Court decision that ruled that while a title that had been fraudulently transferred should be restored to the rightful owner, a mortgage then taken out against the property would stand. The ruling suggested that the owner of the property could seek compensation from the land title assurance fund.

If you are concerned about this sort of fraud and own your home outright there is a way to protect yourself:

Homeowners who are worried, though, can request a duplicate certificate of indefeasible title, which can only be issued for titles that have no financial charges against them, useful perhaps since the con artists target homes that are mortgage free. New Westminster real estate lawyer Alex Sweezey said strata owners also are not a target because on a condominium sale lawyers also have to deal with the strata management company.

The cost of the duplicate title is $50, but once it has been issued nothing can be registered against the title until it is surrendered to the land title authority. Smith said homeowners can get a form to request the duplicate from the land title office or from most lawyers or notaries. However, if it goes missing, replacing it can be costly and time-consuming, involving affidavits and other requirements.

Canada’s inflation rate hit 2.2% in May, jumping from Aprils official rate of 1.7%.  The dramatic increase is blamed mostly on increasing fuel cost:

Statistics Canada said gas prices rose 15 per cent in May from a year earlier, up from a year-on-year pace of 11.6 per cent in April. Excluding gasoline prices, the 12-month growth in the CPI in May was 1.6 per cent, it said.

Meanwhile core inflation, which excludes volatile energy and food prices and which the central bank monitors for underlying price pressures, rose 1.5 per cent in May from the same month last year - the same pace as the 12-month increase in April.

“Lower prices for passenger vehicles dampened the upward pressure on the core index,” the agency said.

Last week, the Bank of Canada surprised markets by not cutting its key interest rate and expressing concern over growing inflationary pressures. The key rate remains at three per cent.

Thursday’s CPI number surpassed the central bank’s two per cent target.

Most economists had expected May’s inflation rates would be around 1.9 per cent.

We could always deal with inflationary concerns the way Argentina does - They’ve managed to maintain a remarkable 0.6% official inflation rate in May thanks to the innovative way they calculate the figure:

According to the new methodology, every time a product’s price rises too sharply, it will simply be removed from the index on the ground that consumers will be deterred by the expense and switch to other goods.

Vision Vancouver mayoral candidate Gregor Robertson has proposed that Vancouver implement a speculator tax to deter condo speculation. In this case speculation is defined by the condo unit being left vacant rather than by flipping or simply taking on more debt than you can handle based on the hope of future gains.

Robertson justifies the need for this tax by referring to the BC Hydro grow-op study that found 18,000 vacant condos in Vancouver, which is equal to half the total number of condos in the Downtown Westend. This number is said not to include units that are part-time occupied as second homes or vacation properties, only units that use no electricity through the year.

The obvious difficulty comes in defining the criteria by which condos would be taxed at the business rate. Taxes on speculation are often based on ‘flipping’ rather than holding an empty condo. How do you determine if a condo truly is empty? Would there be penalties for ‘faking’ occupancy? What are your thoughts on this proposal, would it help or hurt the Vancouver housing market?

There are increasing indications that our reputation of being a financially conservative in Canada is more myth than reality.  As a group, we’re taking on more debt than ever before and finding ourselves with less of a personal safety net should the economy take a dive.  Since 2001 the number of people over 60 that still have a mortgage has been steadily increasing, and the mortgages that we all hold are of more and more exotic varieties.  From todays Vancouver Province: Why we’re up to our necks in debt.

A rash of recent reports paint a scary picture of Canadians as spending like drunken sailors, leading to the prickly question of whether we should be forced to save money.

A Statistics Canada study showed Canadians are finding themselves with two mortgages and deeper in debt than at any time in their lives. They are increasingly house poor, and with housing values sliding, they often owe more on their properties than they’re worth.

…

The StatsCan study came out at the same time that the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada reported that personal bankruptcies reached their highest level in more than four years during April, up 19.3 per cent over the previous month and 18.3 per cent over the previous April.

And things will only get worse if recent numbers showing a gross domestic product decline during the last quarter continue, signalling an economic downturn, and if unemployment rates should start to rise.

As it is, mortgage payments make up 37 per cent of average household spending in 2007, up from 32 per cent a year earlier.

And those mortgages are getting more ‘interesting’.  The common refrain that the Canadian housing market is not as vulnerable to downturn as the US market  because we don’t have ’sub-prime’ mortgages is only part-true.  What we do have is an mortgage insurance market that was liberalized in 2006 and has dramatically changed the landscape in the last few years with the introduction of zero-down, 40 year terms and adjustable ‘teaser’ rate mortgages:

With interest rates dropping, consumers might consider a front-loaded variable- rate mortgage.  This option gives you a larger-than-normal discount from the prime interest rate for an initial period, say six months, before you decide whether to lock into a fixed rate.

Longer amortization periods, now up to 40 years, also are new.  Holt estimates longer-term mortgages now account for three quarters of monthly insured purchase applications in Canada, with 40-year products accounting for half of that.

So will following the US lead into the area of ‘exotic’ mortgages lead to a similar result?  Only time will tell, but it is interesting to see that this topic seems to be getting more attention within the government.  That first article had this bit of info that was new to me:

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty recently suggested it might be wise to outlaw 40-year mortgages.

With up to a third of new mortgage applications opting for the longest term, removing that option could have a dramatic impact on our housing market at a time when it appears to be already slowing due to affordability concerns.

Good news if you’re looking for recreational property in BC, you’ll find less competition as demand has dropped off and recreational property in areas like the south Okanagan has moved into ‘clear buyer territory’ according to RE/Max:

“The demand for waterfront recreational properties remains strong, but prices have stabilized,” Re/Max regional executive vice-president Elton Ash said in an interview. “That’s good news for consumers because there are fewer multiple offers driving prices higher.”

As well, Ash said, the availability of bargain real estate properties in the U.S. has clearly reduced the number of buyers looking at Canadian recreational properties.

“We see U.S. owners of Canadian properties putting them up for sale now so they can take their profits and reinvest them in the U.S sun belt,” Ash said.

…

While the price of a three-bedroom winterized home on ocean frontage on Saltspring Island starts at about $1.3 million, there are more affordable properties for sale throughout B.C.

The report said the South Okanagan market has moved into “clear buyer territory” for the first time in five years, with rising inventories, falling sales and price corrections underway.

The price of a two-bedroom condo on the water near Penticton now starts at about $400,000, with some developers paying the GST and providing complete appliance packages.

The report noted the North Okanagan recreational property market has also reached a plateau, but affordability remains an issue with a typical three-bedroom winterized home on a 66-foot Okanagan Lake lot starting at $1.5 million.

Does less competition and low interest rates make this the perfect buying opportunity or are ‘price corrections’ due to take a further chunk out of the recreational real estate market?

A cautionary tale in todays Vancouver Sun for those seeking high returns AND security in a real estate investment: Two time real estate loser leaves investors high and dry.

A former bankrupt, Hauff made his first stab at developing the 35-acre residential project on Bullock Lake near Ganges in 1996. To fund the development, he borrowed millions of dollars from Multimetro Mortgage Corp. at up to 20 per cent per annum.

Multimetro, run by Vancouver businessman Ken Megale, raised most of the money from mom-and-pop investors. He promised them extremely high rates of return and assured them it was a safe, fully secured investment.

In fact, the project was mismanaged from start to finish, and ended in foreclosure. Multimetro lenders, who were owed $11 million including accrued interest, lost everything.

… but dreams die hard, so Hauff bought the property back out of foreclosure for $9 million and started all over, this time with money from Calgary based Gibraltar Mortage Corp at a 24% per annum rate.

Like Multimetro, Gibraltar raised the money from many small investors, promising them high returns on a supposedly fully secured basis.

Alas, under Hauff’s stewardship, the project once again stalled. In February 2007, Gibraltar called its loans and David Bowra was appointed receiver.

Subsequently, the resort lodge and spa burned down. The insurer has agreed to pay $7.4 million compensation. The property, as is, is estimated to be worth another $18 million to $20 million. So in total, creditors might realize anywhere from $25 million to $28 million.

Meanwhile, there is about $36 million worth of debt on the property, most of it owed to Gibraltar investors. Interest is accruing at the rate of about $600,000 per month. There are also property taxes and professional fees to be paid. So even on a best-case scenario, creditors are going to take a serious hit.

Read the full article here.