According to an article in todays Province CMHC has gotten out the crystal balls and they forsee a ‘return to balance‘ in the next year or so in the Vancouver housing market. Hopefully they’re reading the tea leaves and not smoking them. As prices and interest rates have inched up over the years they believe that the recent slow-down is a sign of things to come:
“In general, we see a trend toward more balanced conditions next year,” said Cameron Muir, senior market analyst for CMHC in Vancouver. “In the last few years, most markets in the province have been in the seller’s favour.
“The erosion of affordability is going to begin to impact the market next year. High home prices and increasing interest rates will make housing less affordable and squeeze out buyers at the margins.
“With fewer first-time buyers able to afford homes, it will ripple through the whole market.
“It’s not a disaster, it’s a return to balance,” Muir added.
Ever seen a see-saw when one person gets off? The unlucky fella left on the other end usually ends up with a bloody nose.
I don’t think that anyone could have predicted this, but apparently it is quite expensive to host the Olympics. Original cost estimates have this way of ballooning over time and suddenly people aren’t so keen on paying for it all.
Today’s tale of olympic price over-runs is in the vancouver sun where we learn that building the Paralympic sledge hocky arena may now be too expensive for Whistler.
The price tag for Whistler to build a bells-and-whistles 2,750-seat arena in the village for Paralympic sledge hockey may force the resort municipality to abandon the project.
It could also result in much of the 2010 Paralympic Winter Games being moved to Vancouver.
Nearly four weeks after telling a council meeting that the cost, now believed to be in the $45-million to $50-million range and the long-term operating costs, were “more than we can comfortably afford,” Mayor Ken Melamed says it may be too late to salvage the project.
“There comes a point in time when we can’t physically build it in time,” Melamed said. “Frankly, we may have crossed it.”
Meanwhile Athens struggles to find a use for Olympic venues built there for the 2004 olympics.
In what critics say is a checklist of how not to do things for future Olympic cities, especially London in 2012, Athens is still struggling to find use for the state-of-the-art venues it paid more than 3.5 billion euros ($4.50 billion) to build.
Promising to showcase modern Greece, the Games went off without a hitch despite years of construction delays, but left a legacy of over-spending and venues in a state of abandon.
The wild water canoe and kayak facility was hailed as the world’s best, as were the rowing centre and the weightlifting arena.
But two years after the Games that cost a record 12 billion euros, most venues remain fully or partly shut as the government desperately seeks private investors, the only viable option to recoup some of the funds pumped in to build and maintain them.
“We cannot keep them as Soviet-style sports venues alone. What would Greece do with the world’s best canoe and kayak facility?” said Christos Hadjiemmanouil, the head of the company managing most Olympic venues.
A study released by UBS bank compares the cost of living in different cities based on the average number of minutes required to work to afford a BigMac at local market prices. At the very top of the results is Tokyo, where average wages mean 10 minutes of work equals one Big Mac. Unfortunately it doesn’t look like they included Vancouver in the study (come on guys! we’re world class!), but in Toronto the average wage means 14 minutes of work to buy the burger.
Tokyo scored at the top of the survey, which aims to eliminate variables such as exchange rates, even though it is one of the most expensive cities in the world, UBS said in the Prices and Earnings report released Wednesday.
â€œWages only become meaningful in relation to prices â€” that is, what can be bought with the money earned,â€ it said.
The bank calculated the â€œweighted net hourly wage in 14 professionsâ€ and divided it into the local price of â€œa globally available product,â€ for which it chose McDonald’s flagship hamburger.
It seems very strange to me that even though they have the highest purchasing power, a graph of Tokyo land prices over the last 20 years looks like this:
What happened there? Maybe there is no fundamental link between real-estate prices and local market earning power. Another example: the price of an average house in Vancouver will get you two average houses in Toronto, but the average income in Toronto is higher than Vancouver. For 2004 statcan says average family income in Toronto was 60,100 while in Vancouver it was 56,200.
Obviously income is not the only factor in local market value, but how much are we betting that future demand will hold if local economic factors don’t change dramatically?
Builders are building cheaper condos, apartments and townhomes because that’s what the market is demanding. Solid well-built homes are no longer fashionable as buyers now desire homes made out of cardboard and duct tape. New material technology makes the leaky condo crisis a thing of the past as new homes can simply be wrung out by hand if they become too moist.
“Canada’s construction boom continued in July, but Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. says it is seeing a swing away from single-family units towards cheaper condominiums, townhouses and apartments.”
Is that evidence of increased demand for this kind of dwelling or are the limits of affordability being reached? Ah! Here it we are, its a ‘growing interest in less expensive dwellings’:
“Strong multiple starts reflect a growing interest in relatively less expensive dwellings,” said Bob Dugan, chief economist at CMHC’s market analysis centre.
Single-family homes have been trending down for several months, reaching their lowest level of the year in July. It is a trend that Dugan expects will continue for the remainder of the year.
“Rising prices and slightly higher mortgage rates are expected to soften the demand for new homes in the second half of 2006,â€ he said.”
article on CBC
I think there is a tendancy among people looking to buy in a booming real estate market to think that people who bought several years ago have it easy. If you are out house-hunting, looking at the way prices have risen dramatically over the last couple of years, you probably have a couple of worries: What if I don’t buy and prices keep going up until I can’t afford to buy anything? Or the flip side: What if I buy and prices drop wiping out my downpayment or interest rates go up and I can’t afford my mortgage?
These are all valid concerns, but what about current owners? Owning real estate in vancouver is not the panacea that some might think, and some of the same concerns affect the comfort and security of people who bought years ago. If you own and prices are high your money is only paper-wealth. Until you sell and actually capture that money it merely means that your property taxes are higher. I suppose it also means that you can take out multiple mortgages based on the paper value of your property, but that’s just more debt, not more money.
So what do you do as an owner after seeing prices rise like they have? If you sell and grab the cash what do you do with it? Buying another home in Vancouver just means you’re buying at current values, which doesn’t add anything to your bottom line. With the high Canadian dollar and market starting to falter in the US it might be a good time to think about investing there, but do you really want to move? Do you rent and wait to see if prices drop or level off?
Either way it’s a gamble. Bubbly real estate markets can be emotional rollercoaster for owners as well as sellers and buyers. What does the future hold? We’ll just have to wait and see.